Buajeeb W, Kraivaphan P, Pobrurksa C
Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997 Jan;83(1):21-5. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(97)90085-8.
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of retinoic acid in an oral base 0.05% with fluocinolone acetonide in an oral base 0.1% in the treatment of atrophic and erosive oral lichen planus. Thirty-three patients with histologically proven oral lichen planus were asked to participate in the study. Lesions were scored ranging from 0 (no lesion) to 5 (large erosion) according to the severity. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either topical fluocinolone acetonide or topical retinoic acid. They were instructed to apply the medication on dried lesions four times a day. The lesions were evaluated after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. The sign scores were analyzed by the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Eighteen patients receiving topical fluocinolone acetonide improved from the average score of 3.0 to 1.5 after 4 weeks of treatment, whereas 15 patients receiving topical retinoic acid showed little change (average score, 2.9 and 2.4, respectively). The changes were statistically significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.01). The results suggest that 0.1% fluocinolone acetonide reduced the severity of atrophic and erosive oral lichen planus better than 0.05% retinoic acid.
本研究的目的是比较0.05%口服型维甲酸与0.1%口服型醋酸氟轻松治疗萎缩性及糜烂性口腔扁平苔藓的疗效。33例经组织学证实为口腔扁平苔藓的患者被要求参与本研究。根据严重程度,病变的评分范围为0(无病变)至5(大面积糜烂)。患者被随机分配接受局部用醋酸氟轻松或局部用维甲酸治疗。他们被指示每天在干燥的病变处涂抹药物4次。在治疗2周和4周后对病变进行评估。体征评分采用Wilcoxon秩和检验进行分析。18例接受局部用醋酸氟轻松治疗的患者在治疗4周后,平均评分从3.0改善至1.5,而15例接受局部用维甲酸治疗的患者变化不大(平均评分分别为2.9和2.4)。两组之间的变化在统计学上有显著差异(p = 0.01)。结果表明,0.1%醋酸氟轻松比0.05%维甲酸能更好地降低萎缩性及糜烂性口腔扁平苔藓的严重程度。