Assessing case records using monitor criteria developed from consensus guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

To develop criteria to enable the monitoring of general practitioner (GP) case records using consensus guidelines for conditions commonly managed in general practice and to measure how well the case records of a non random sample of GPs conformed to these criteria.

METHOD

An iterative process was used to develop criteria from consensus guidelines for 19 conditions. Criteria were also developed to enable monitoring of the structure and content of the patient case record. A non random sample of GPs in Adelaide was approached to allow measurement of the content of their case records against these criteria. This measurement was undertaken by allied health professionals. An overall percentage score of conformity with the criteria was created for 10 acute, and six chronic conditions and for the patient case record review. These were rank ordered and Kendall's rank order correlation coefficients were used to compare the results in these three areas of practice.

RESULTS

Criteria were successfully developed for each condition. Thirty-one GPs had their patient case records assessed. There was substantial variability between these practitioners in their conformity to the criteria. Kendall's rank order coefficients found statistically significant correlation between the results for acute and chronic conditions, and between acute conditions and the patient case record review section.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible to develop criteria that enable measurement of the conformity of GP case records to these criteria. The overall level of conformity, together with the substantial variability found between practitioners suggest that there is a need for GPs to address this area of their practice.