• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

猴子中组织对间隙关闭的反应:正畸磁体与超弹性螺旋弹簧的比较

Tissue response to space closure in monkeys: a comparison of orthodontic magnets and superelastic coil springs.

作者信息

Linder-Aronson A, Forsberg C M, Rygh P, Lindskog S

机构信息

Department of Oral Histology and Cell Biology, School of Dentistry, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 1996 Dec;18(6):581-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/18.6.581.

DOI:10.1093/ejo/18.6.581
PMID:9009422
Abstract

Interest in using magnets for generating orthodontic forces started with the widespread availability of rare earth magnetic alloys. In vivo studies have indicated that a static magnetic field and/or corrosion products from the magnetic materials may induce biological effects when in close contact with cells or tissues. In the clinical situation, orthodontic magnets are often situated some distance away from the gingiva and bone. Consequently, the previously observed biological effects may not be found in an experimental situation mimicking the clinical setting. Thus, the present experimental study was undertaken to test this hypothesis using commercially available cobalt-samarium magnets for orthodontic treatment in comparison to treatment with Sentalloy closed coil springs with respect to possible side effects on alveolar bone growth, gingival epithelial thickness as well as rate of space closure. Corrosion of the uncovered areas of the magnets was already evident after 6 weeks. No statistical differences were found between the magnet and coil spring specimens with respect to rate of space closure, bone formation or epithelial thickness. The only two variables that differed significantly between magnet and coil spring specimens was that there were more resorption and more tetracycline labelled osteocyte lacunae under the magnets. In conclusion, although some marginal statistical differences were found between the magnet and coil spring specimens with respect to cell and tissue reactions, the near lack of cell and tissue effects of the magnets in the present clinical experimental situation compared to previous studies in which the magnets were positioned in close contact with the tissue under study, indicate limited adverse clinical effects.

摘要

利用磁铁产生正畸力的研究始于稀土磁性合金的广泛应用。体内研究表明,静磁场和/或磁性材料的腐蚀产物在与细胞或组织紧密接触时可能会诱导生物学效应。在临床情况下,正畸磁铁通常与牙龈和骨骼保持一定距离。因此,在模拟临床环境的实验中可能无法发现先前观察到的生物学效应。因此,本实验研究旨在使用市售的钴钐磁铁进行正畸治疗,与使用Sentalloy闭合线圈弹簧治疗相比,测试其对牙槽骨生长、牙龈上皮厚度以及间隙关闭速率的可能副作用。6周后,磁铁未覆盖区域的腐蚀已经很明显。在间隙关闭速率、骨形成或上皮厚度方面,磁铁和线圈弹簧样本之间未发现统计学差异。磁铁和线圈弹簧样本之间仅有的两个显著不同的变量是,磁铁下方有更多的吸收和更多的四环素标记骨细胞陷窝。总之,尽管在细胞和组织反应方面,磁铁和线圈弹簧样本之间发现了一些边缘统计学差异,但与之前磁铁与所研究组织紧密接触的研究相比,在目前的临床实验情况下,磁铁对细胞和组织的影响几乎不存在,表明临床不良反应有限。

相似文献

1
Tissue response to space closure in monkeys: a comparison of orthodontic magnets and superelastic coil springs.猴子中组织对间隙关闭的反应:正畸磁体与超弹性螺旋弹簧的比较
Eur J Orthod. 1996 Dec;18(6):581-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/18.6.581.
2
Orthodontic magnets. A study of force and field pattern, biocompatibility and clinical effects.正畸磁体。力与场模式、生物相容性及临床效果的研究。
Swed Dent J Suppl. 1994;99:1-148.
3
Force-distance relation and properties of repelling Sm-Co5 magnets in orthodontic clinical use: an experimental model.正畸临床应用中排斥性Sm-Co5磁体的力-距离关系及特性:一个实验模型
Scand J Dent Res. 1992 Aug;100(4):228-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1992.tb01747.x.
4
Force generation by orthodontic samarium-cobalt magnets.正畸用钐钴磁体产生的力
Angle Orthod. 1992 Fall;62(3):191-4; discussion 195-6. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1992)062<0191:FGBOSM>2.0.CO;2.
5
Orthodontic magnets: effects on gingival epithelium and alveolar bone in monkeys.
Eur J Orthod. 1992 Aug;14(4):255-63. doi: 10.1093/ejo/14.4.255.
6
Repelling magnets versus super elastic nickel-titanium coils.排斥磁体与超弹性镍钛线圈
Angle Orthod. 1995;65(1):8-10. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0009:RMVSEN>2.0.CO;2.
7
Proximal alveolar bone level after orthodontic treatment with magnets, superelastic coils and straight-wire appliances.使用磁体、超弹性线圈和直丝矫治器进行正畸治疗后的近中牙槽骨水平
Angle Orthod. 1997;67(1):7-14. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1997)067<0007:PABLAO>2.3.CO;2.
8
Superelastic nickel titanium coil springs.超弹性镍钛合金螺旋弹簧
Br J Orthod. 1995 Nov;22(4):370-6. doi: 10.1179/bjo.22.4.370.
9
Coating failure of commercial orthodontic magnets and DNA fragmentation of oral mucosa cells.商用正畸磁体的涂层失效与口腔黏膜细胞的DNA片段化
Aust Orthod J. 2008 May;24(1):32-40.
10
The effects of samarium-cobalt magnets and pulsed electromagnetic fields on tooth movement.钐钴磁体和脉冲电磁场对牙齿移动的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jun;107(6):578-88. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70100-1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Review of Bioeffects of Static Magnetic Fields on the Oral Tissue-Derived Cells and Its Application in Regenerative Medicine.静磁场对口腔组织来源细胞的生物效应评价及其在再生医学中的应用。
Cells. 2021 Oct 5;10(10):2662. doi: 10.3390/cells10102662.