Leino L, Sorvajärvi K, Katajisto J, Laine M, Lilius E M, Pelliniemi T T, Rajamäki A, Silvoniemi P, Nikoskelainen J
Department of Haematology, Turku University Central Hospital, Finland.
Clin Exp Immunol. 1997 Jan;107(1):37-43. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1997.d01-899.x.
We have examined the expression of the IgG Fc receptors (FcRI, FcRII, FcRIII) and complement receptors (CR1, CR3) in neutrophils from 42 patients with febrile bacterial infection, 20 patients with febrile viral infection and 69 non-febrile healthy individuals. Using receptor-specific MoAbs and immunofluorescence flow cytometry the relative fluorescence intensity (as a measure of receptor number) and the proportion of receptor-positive cells were determined in peripheral blood neutrophils exposed to minimal processing, consisting only of erythrolysis. Both the percentage of FcRI-positive neutrophils and FcRI number per neutrophil were significantly (P < 0.001 and P < 0.0001) increased in bacterial infected patients compared with controls, whereas in viral infected patients only the FcRI percentage was markedly elevated (P < 0.05). In addition, both FcRII and CR1 levels were significantly higher in the bacterial infection group than in the viral infection and control groups (bacterial versus control P < 0.001, bacterial versus viral P < 0.0001). No changes in expression of FcRIII or CR3 were found in the patient groups. The kinetic analysis of receptor expression in bacterial infection patients revealed a shift in the percentage of FcRI-bearing neutrophils towards normal values already on day 2 after the first analysis. On the other hand, the levels of FcRI, FcRII and CR1 remained clearly elevated in these patients during 1 week's follow-up period. We conclude that febrile infection may cause systemic activation of the entire pool of circulating neutrophils, resulting in alterations in cell surface receptor expression, some of which are characteristic of the nature of the infectious agent.
我们检测了42例发热性细菌感染患者、20例发热性病毒感染患者和69例非发热健康个体中性粒细胞中IgG Fc受体(FcRI、FcRII、FcRIII)和补体受体(CR1、CR3)的表达。使用受体特异性单克隆抗体和免疫荧光流式细胞术,在仅经过红细胞溶解这一最小程度处理的外周血中性粒细胞中,测定相对荧光强度(作为受体数量的指标)和受体阳性细胞的比例。与对照组相比,细菌感染患者中FcRI阳性中性粒细胞的百分比和每个中性粒细胞的FcRI数量均显著增加(P < 0.001和P < 0.0001),而在病毒感染患者中,只有FcRI百分比明显升高(P < 0.05)。此外,细菌感染组的FcRII和CR1水平均显著高于病毒感染组和对照组(细菌感染组与对照组相比P < 0.001,细菌感染组与病毒感染组相比P < 0.0001)。在患者组中未发现FcRIII或CR3表达的变化。对细菌感染患者受体表达的动力学分析显示,在首次分析后第2天,携带FcRI的中性粒细胞百分比已向正常值转变。另一方面,在1周的随访期内,这些患者的FcRI、FcRII和CR1水平仍明显升高。我们得出结论,发热性感染可能导致循环中性粒细胞整体池的全身激活,从而导致细胞表面受体表达的改变,其中一些改变是感染病原体性质的特征。