Grimmer K, Bowman P
Allied Health Ambulatory Care Reform Project, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Australia.
J Qual Clin Pract. 1996 Dec;16(4):185-94.
This paper presents the results of a survey that was conducted under the auspices of a Commonwealth-funded Ambulatory Care Reform Project. The survey was undertaken in all telephone areas of South Australia (08, 085, 086, 087, 088) to investigate issues of access to, and availability of, clinical allied health outpatient services at the Royal Adelaide Hospital with respect to general practitioners. Six hundred and twenty general practitioners in South Australia received a mailed survey enclosing a reply-paid envelop. Forty-nine per cent of the general practitioners responded. The highest response was from practitioners in the metropolitan area (08 telephone area) and the immediate Adelaide country area (085 telephone area). General practitioners supplied quality and in-depth responses that clearly indicated issues they felt impeded full use of clinical allied health services at the Royal Adelaide Hospital. These issues have implications not only for the clinical allied health outpatient services at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, but for all clinical allied health outpatient services in the public hospital system.
本文介绍了一项在英联邦资助的门诊护理改革项目主持下进行的调查结果。该调查在南澳大利亚的所有电话区号地区（08、085、086、087、088）开展，旨在调查皇家阿德莱德医院临床联合健康门诊服务在全科医生方面的可及性和可得性问题。南澳大利亚的620名全科医生收到了一份附有回邮信封的邮寄调查问卷。49%的全科医生进行了回复。回复率最高的是大都市地区（08电话区号）和阿德莱德近郊乡村地区（085电话区号）的从业者。全科医生提供了高质量且深入的回复，清楚地表明了他们认为阻碍皇家阿德莱德医院充分利用临床联合健康服务的问题。这些问题不仅对皇家阿德莱德医院的临床联合健康门诊服务有影响，对公立医院系统中的所有临床联合健康门诊服务也有影响。
