Pallan Miranda, Linnane John, Ramaiah Sam
Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT.
J Public Health (Oxf). 2005 Jun;27(2):176-81. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdi006. Epub 2005 Mar 4.
Health care services traditionally offered in a secondary setting are increasingly being offered in a primary setting. There has been little assessment of quality and efficiency of diagnostic services such as ultrasound delivered in primary settings and no studies have looked at independently provided services.
To assess the benefits and disadvantages of a radiographer delivered, primary care-based mobile diagnostic ultrasound service by comparing it to an NHS Trust diagnostic ultrasound service.
A retrospective, comparative study.
A primary care area in the West Midlands.
Random samples of 200 and 193 adult patients who underwent diagnostic ultrasound in 2001/2002 with the community and NHS Trust services respectively, and all GP principals in the area were identified. Patient access (including wait for appointments), patient and GP satisfaction, clinical quality of services, and cost-effectiveness were assessed by postal questionnaires, interviews, review of stored ultrasound images, patient record review and collection of data on unit costs.
Mean wait for an appointment was 17.44 (15.85-19.02) and 44.53 days (38.83-50.23) for the community and NHS Trust services respectively. Response rates from the community and hospital patient groups were 52.9 percent and 44.6 percent, respectively. Demographic characteristics of the two groups of respondents did not differ significantly, therefore justifying comparison between the two groups of respondents. High proportions of patients from both services reported time and location of appointment as convenient. Access to secondary care following an abnormal ultrasound was not systematically different for the services. Patients were highly satisfied with both services. GPs were markedly less satisfied with the NHS Trust service compared to the community service. Quality of stored ultrasound images and reports were comparable for the services. Cost per abnormality detected was higher for the community service (107.69 pound sterling compared to 77.35 pound sterling for the NHS Trust service, not statistically significant).
The community diagnostic ultrasound service offers reduced waiting times compared to the NHS Trust service, and is of comparable quality. This benefit, together with high patient and GP satisfaction levels, may justify the possible reduced cost-effectiveness of the service compared to the NHS Trust service.
传统上在二级医疗机构提供的医疗服务越来越多地在初级医疗机构提供。对于初级医疗机构中提供的诸如超声等诊断服务的质量和效率,几乎没有进行过评估,也没有研究关注独立提供的服务。
通过将基于初级医疗的放射技师提供的移动诊断超声服务与国民健康服务信托基金(NHS Trust)的诊断超声服务进行比较,评估其利弊。
一项回顾性比较研究。
西米德兰兹郡的一个初级医疗区域。
分别确定了2001/2002年在社区和国民健康服务信托基金服务机构接受诊断超声检查的200名和193名成年患者的随机样本,以及该地区所有的全科医生负责人。通过邮寄问卷、访谈、审查存储的超声图像、查阅患者记录以及收集单位成本数据,对患者就诊情况(包括等待预约时间)、患者和全科医生的满意度、服务的临床质量以及成本效益进行了评估。
社区服务和国民健康服务信托基金服务的平均预约等待时间分别为17.44天(15.85 - 19.02天)和44.53天(38.83 - 50.23天)。社区和医院患者组的回复率分别为52.9%和44.6%。两组受访者的人口统计学特征没有显著差异,因此可以对两组受访者进行比较。两种服务的高比例患者都报告预约时间和地点很方便。超声检查异常后获得二级医疗服务的情况在两种服务之间没有系统性差异。患者对两种服务都高度满意。与社区服务相比,全科医生对国民健康服务信托基金服务的满意度明显较低。两种服务存储的超声图像和报告的质量相当。社区服务检测到每例异常的成本更高(107.69英镑,而国民健康服务信托基金服务为77.35英镑,无统计学显著差异)。
与国民健康服务信托基金服务相比,社区诊断超声服务的等待时间更短,质量相当。与国民健康服务信托基金服务相比,这项服务可能成本效益较低,但这种益处以及患者和全科医生的高满意度可能使其具有合理性。