Vantrimpont P, Rouleau J L, Wun C C, Ciampi A, Klein M, Sussex B, Arnold J M, Moyé L, Pfeffer M
Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Quebec, Canada.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Feb;29(2):229-36. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00489-5.
This study assessed whether treatment with a beta-adrenergic blocking agent in addition to the use of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor captopril decreases cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction (MI) and whether the presence of neurohumoral activation at the time of hospital discharge predicts the effects of beta-blocker treatment in these patients.
Both beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors have been shown to have beneficial effects in patients with left ventricular dysfunction but no overt heart failure after MI. These patients often have persistent neurohumoral activation at the time of hospital discharge, and one would expect that patients with activation of the sympathetic nervous system derive the most benefit from treatment with beta-blockers. However, beta-blockers are underutilized in this high risk group of patients, and it is unknown whether their beneficial effects are additive to those of ACE inhibitors.
We performed a retrospective analysis of data from the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) study and its neurohumoral substudy. The relations between beta-blocker use at the time of randomization and neurohumoral activation and the subsequent development of cardiovascular events were analyzed by use of Cox proportional hazards models controlling for covariates.
After adjustment for baseline imbalances, beta-blocker use was associated with a significant reduction in risk of cardiovascular death (30%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12% to 44%) and development of heart failure (21%, 95% CI 3% to 36%), but the reduction in recurrent MI (11%, 95% CI 13% to 31%) was not significant. These reductions were independent of the use of captopril. Beta-blockers were not found to have a greater effect in patients with neurohumoral activation at the time of hospital discharge.
The beneficial effects of beta-blocker use at the time of hospital discharge in patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction after MI appear to be additive to those of captopril and other interventions known to improve prognosis. Neurohumoral activation at the time of hospital discharge fails to identify those patients who will derive the greatest benefit from treatment with beta-blockers.
本研究评估了在使用血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂卡托普利的基础上加用β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂治疗是否能降低心肌梗死(MI)后无症状左心室功能障碍患者的心血管死亡率和发病率,以及出院时神经体液激活的存在是否能预测β受体阻滞剂治疗对这些患者的效果。
β受体阻滞剂和ACE抑制剂已被证明对左心室功能障碍但MI后无明显心力衰竭的患者有益。这些患者在出院时通常存在持续的神经体液激活,人们预期交感神经系统激活的患者从β受体阻滞剂治疗中获益最大。然而,β受体阻滞剂在这一高危患者群体中的使用不足,其有益效果是否与ACE抑制剂相加尚不清楚。
我们对生存与心室扩大(SAVE)研究及其神经体液亚研究的数据进行了回顾性分析。通过使用控制协变量的Cox比例风险模型,分析了随机分组时β受体阻滞剂的使用与神经体液激活以及随后心血管事件发生之间的关系。
在对基线不平衡进行调整后,使用β受体阻滞剂与心血管死亡风险显著降低(30%,95%置信区间[CI]12%至44%)和心力衰竭发生风险降低(21%,95%CI 3%至36%)相关,但复发性MI风险降低(11%,95%CI 13%至31%)不显著。这些降低与卡托普利的使用无关。未发现β受体阻滞剂对出院时神经体液激活的患者有更大的作用。
MI后无症状左心室功能障碍患者出院时使用β受体阻滞剂的有益效果似乎与卡托普利及其他已知可改善预后的干预措施相加。出院时的神经体液激活未能识别出那些将从β受体阻滞剂治疗中获益最大的患者。