Russo A, Priante G, Tommasi A M
Department of Biology, University of Padova, Italy.
Mutat Res. 1996 Dec;372(2):173-80. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(96)00137-6.
Primed In Situ DNA Synthesis (PRINS) of telomeric and centromeric (minor satellite DNA) sequences has been applied together with the cytokinesis block micronucleus (MN) assay in mouse splenocytes, with the aim of understanding the mechanism of origin of spontaneous and induced MN. Splenocyte cultures were treated in vitro either with the clastogenic agent mitomycin C or with the aneugenic compound colcemid. The relative proportions of MN carrying 1 to 4 telomeric signals were in agreement with the known mechanism of action of the chemicals tested, i.e., an higher number of MN with less than 4 telomeres were found in MMC-than in colcemid-treated cultures. No MN lacking the telomeric sequences (0 spot) were found, indicating that the observed distributions should not be affected by false-negative data. Furthermore, all MN carrying a single telomere were negative for the centromere, thus indicating that this class represents true chromosome acentric fragments. Finally, MN with 4 telomeric spots always carried the centromeric sequence, as expected on the hypothesis that these MN correspond to whole chromosomes. With respect to centromere-positive MN, more than one half carried 4 telomeric signals (whole chromosomes), and only 1/4 or less showed 2 telomeric signals (probably corresponding to a single chromatid). This difference was statistically significant, either in untreated cultures or in cultures exposed to mitomycin C or colcemid. On the whole, these data indicate that non-disjunction followed by whole chromosome loss (with the production of two daughter monosomic nuclei) may be the main mechanism of malsegregation leading to MN formation.
端粒和着丝粒(微小卫星DNA)序列的原位引物DNA合成(PRINS)已与胞质分裂阻断微核(MN)试验一起应用于小鼠脾细胞,目的是了解自发和诱导微核的起源机制。脾细胞培养物在体外分别用致断裂剂丝裂霉素C或非整倍体化合物秋水仙酰胺处理。携带1至4个端粒信号的微核的相对比例与所测试化学物质的已知作用机制一致,即在丝裂霉素C处理的培养物中发现的端粒少于4个的微核数量比秋水仙酰胺处理的培养物中更多。未发现缺乏端粒序列(0个位点)的微核,这表明观察到的分布不应受假阴性数据的影响。此外,所有携带单个端粒的微核着丝粒均为阴性,因此表明此类代表真正的染色体无着丝粒片段。最后,具有4个端粒位点的微核总是携带着丝粒序列,这与这些微核对应于整条染色体的假设预期一致。关于着丝粒阳性微核,超过一半携带4个端粒信号(整条染色体),只有四分之一或更少显示2个端粒信号(可能对应于单个染色单体)。无论是在未处理的培养物中还是在暴露于丝裂霉素C或秋水仙酰胺的培养物中,这种差异都具有统计学意义。总体而言,这些数据表明,随后整条染色体丢失(产生两个子代单体核)的不分离可能是导致微核形成的错误分离的主要机制。