• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[创伤性脑损伤患者伤后一年的恢复情况]

[Recovery of patients with traumatic brain injuries one year after the trauma].

作者信息

de Sousa R M, Koizumi M S

机构信息

Departamento de Enfermagem Médico-Cirúrgica, Escola de Enfermagem da USP.

出版信息

Rev Esc Enferm USP. 1996 Dec;30(3):484-500.

PMID:9016161
Abstract

A prospective longitudinal study of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients was conducted to identify the recovery pattern 1 year after trauma. Patients with all levels of injury and age between 12 and 60 years were observed. They were analyzed using the eight-point Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) as well as their return to productivity in that period. The majority of victims (77.2%) made good recovery, that is (GOS = 0 or 1) and complete recovery or GOS 0 was achieved in 38.6% of then. However at the 1 year mark, 22.8% of the victims showed disabilities. Overall, victims had returned to productivity in that period (83.3%) but 19.4% of them have had changes in their productivity and 16.7% didn't return to your job.).

摘要

一项针对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的前瞻性纵向研究旨在确定创伤后1年的恢复模式。观察了所有损伤程度且年龄在12至60岁之间的患者。使用八点格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)对他们进行分析,并分析他们在该时期的恢复工作能力。大多数受害者(77.2%)恢复良好,即(GOS = 0或1),38.6%的受害者实现了完全恢复或GOS为0。然而,在1年时,22.8%的受害者存在残疾。总体而言,受害者在该时期恢复了工作能力(83.3%),但其中19.4%的人工作能力发生了变化,16.7%的人没有恢复工作。

相似文献

1
[Recovery of patients with traumatic brain injuries one year after the trauma].[创伤性脑损伤患者伤后一年的恢复情况]
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 1996 Dec;30(3):484-500.
2
[Pattern of recovery of victims of cranio-encephalic injuries at 6 months and 1 year].[颅脑损伤患者6个月及1年时的恢复模式]
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 1995 Aug;29(2):224-5.
3
Analysis of long-term (median 10.5 years) outcomes in children presenting with traumatic brain injury and an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 or 4.对初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为3或4分的创伤性脑损伤患儿的长期(中位时间10.5年)预后分析。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Oct;16(4):410-9. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.PEDS14679. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
4
A prospective study on employment outcome 3 years after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.中重度创伤性脑损伤后 3 年的就业结果前瞻性研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jun;93(6):993-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.01.018. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
5
Functional outcome scales in traumatic brain injury: a comparison of the Glasgow Outcome Scale (Extended) and the Functional Status Examination.创伤性脑损伤的功能结局量表:格拉斯哥结局量表(扩展版)与功能状态检查的比较
J Neurotrauma. 2005 Nov;22(11):1319-26. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.1319.
6
Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers versus glasgow coma scale and glasgow outcome scale in pediatric traumatic brain injury: the role of young age and inflicted injury.小儿创伤性脑损伤中脑脊液生物标志物与格拉斯哥昏迷量表及格拉斯哥预后量表的比较:年龄小及非意外伤害的作用
J Neurotrauma. 2007 Jan;24(1):75-86. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0062.
7
Aging effect on psychosocial outcome in traumatic brain injury.年龄对创伤性脑损伤心理社会结局的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Aug;79(8):881-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90082-x.
8
Natural history of recovery from brain injury after prolonged disorders of consciousness: outcome of patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation with 1-4 year follow-up.脑损伤后长时间意识障碍的恢复自然史:1-4 年随访后住院康复患者的结局。
Prog Brain Res. 2009;177:73-88. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17707-5.
9
Does intensive rehabilitation improve the functional outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI)? A randomized controlled trial.强化康复能否改善创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的功能结局?一项随机对照试验。
Brain Inj. 2007 Jun;21(7):681-90. doi: 10.1080/02699050701468941.
10
Long-term neurological and neuropsychological outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.重度创伤性脑损伤患者的长期神经学和神经心理学预后
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Dec;115(12):2482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.09.038. Epub 2013 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Scales for assessment of patients with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者评估量表。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Nov 13;9:1631-3. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S97032. eCollection 2015.