Piasecki E, Knysz B, Inglot M, Simon K, Gładysz A
Laboratory of Virology, Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland.
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 1996;44(5-6):345-52.
Impairment of interferon (IFN) system in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) became a basis for searching IFN responses to monitor the disease progression. For detailed investigations 16 HIV+/AIDS patients with at least 4 successively taken blood samples available for IFN determinations were selected. IFN responses were tested in two ways. Firstly, IFN level in plasma was measured. Secondly, capacity of IFN production by leukocytes was evaluated. The latter was determined in the whole blood assay, in which Newcastle disease virus (NDV) and phytohemagglutinin (PHA) were used as IFN-alpha and IFN-gamma inducers, respectively. The levels of IFN induced in whole blood leukocytes varied considerably in all individuals that had been tested. Nevertheless, two patterns of IFN responses were observed. In pattern I, patients had low levels of IFN in plasma and high levels of induced IFN-alpha and IFN-gamma. It was characteristic for 8 patients in good clinical condition. On the contrary, severe disease found in 2 patients was correlated with high levels of IFN in plasma and low levels of induced IFNs (pattern II). In 6 patients IFN responses were classified as intermediate pattern I/II suggesting transition from pattern I to pattern II. A variation of pattern I was found in the case of a patient defined as long-term survivor having relatively low levels of all IFN tested. The results suggested that interferon measurements reflected clinical condition of HIV+ patients showing not only past but also current immune changes.
人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染及获得性免疫缺陷综合征(AIDS)中干扰素(IFN)系统的损伤成为探寻IFN反应以监测疾病进展的基础。为进行详细研究,选取了16例HIV+/AIDS患者,他们至少有4份连续采集的血样可用于IFN测定。IFN反应通过两种方式进行检测。首先,测量血浆中的IFN水平。其次,评估白细胞产生IFN的能力。后者在全血检测中测定,其中新城疫病毒(NDV)和植物血凝素(PHA)分别用作IFN-α和IFN-γ的诱导剂。在所有接受检测的个体中,全血白细胞诱导产生的IFN水平差异很大。然而,观察到两种IFN反应模式。在模式I中,患者血浆中IFN水平较低,诱导产生的IFN-α和IFN-γ水平较高。这是8例临床状况良好的患者的特征。相反,2例病情严重的患者与血浆中IFN水平高和诱导产生的IFN水平低相关(模式II)。6例患者的IFN反应被归类为中间模式I/II,表明从模式I向模式II转变。在1例被定义为长期存活者的患者中发现了模式I的一种变体,其所有检测的IFN水平相对较低。结果表明,干扰素测量反映了HIV+患者的临床状况,不仅显示过去的免疫变化,也显示当前的免疫变化。