Heinemann L, Traut T, Heise T
Department of Metabolic Diseases and Nutrition, WHO Collaborating Centre for Diabetes, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany.
Diabet Med. 1997 Jan;14(1):63-72. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199701)14:1<63::AID-DIA298>3.0.CO;2-F.
We compared the pharmacodynamics of insulin after inhalation of 99 U microcrystalline solid insulin and subcutaneous injection of 10 U regular insulin and intravenous injection of 5 U regular insulin. The time-action profiles of the three insulin administrations were studied in 11 healthy volunteers using the euglycaemic glucose clamp technique. The insulins were administered to each volunteer on three separate occasions in random order. Onset of action, assessed as glucose infusion rate, after insulin inhalation was substantially more rapid than after subcutaneous injection and half-maximal action was reached earlier (31 +/- 17 vs 54 +/- 12 min; p < 0.001). Maximal metabolic response was reached earlier after insulin inhalation in comparison to subcutaneous injection (108 +/- 49 vs 147 +/- 53 min; p < 0.001). The maximal glucose infusion rate after inhalation of insulin was lower than after subcutaneous insulin injection (6.2 +/2- 2.4 vs 9.1 +/- 2.5 mg kg-1 min-1; p < 0.001). The glucose infusion rates in the first 60 min after inhalation were significantly greater than after insulin injection (area under the glucose infusion rate curve: 0.23 +/- 0.12 vs 0.13 +/- 0.08 g kg-1 60 min-1; p < 0.001). However, the total metabolic effect after inhalation was significantly lower than after insulin injection (1.44 +/- 0.68 vs 1.90 +/- 0.47 g kg-1 360 min-1; p < 0.001). Relative effectiveness of inhaled insulin calculated with regard to the data from the intravenous insulin application was 9.5 +/- 4.1% and of the subcutaneous insulin application was 7.6 +/- 2.9%. With its rapid onset of action, inhaled insulin might have potential for clinical use.
我们比较了吸入99U微晶固体胰岛素、皮下注射10U常规胰岛素和静脉注射5U常规胰岛素后的胰岛素药效学。采用正常血糖葡萄糖钳夹技术,在11名健康志愿者中研究了三种胰岛素给药方式的时间-效应曲线。每种胰岛素以随机顺序在三个不同时间给予每位志愿者。以葡萄糖输注速率评估,胰岛素吸入后的起效时间明显快于皮下注射,且达到最大效应的一半时间更早(31±17分钟对54±12分钟;p<0.001)。与皮下注射相比,胰岛素吸入后达到最大代谢反应的时间更早(108±49分钟对147±53分钟;p<0.001)。吸入胰岛素后的最大葡萄糖输注速率低于皮下注射胰岛素后(6.2±2.4对9.1±2.5mg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹;p<0.001)。吸入后最初60分钟内的葡萄糖输注速率显著高于胰岛素注射后(葡萄糖输注速率曲线下面积:0.23±0.12对0.13±0.08g·kg⁻¹·60min⁻¹;p<0.001)。然而,吸入后的总代谢效应显著低于胰岛素注射后(1.44±0.68对1.90±0.47g·kg⁻¹·360min⁻¹;p<0.001)。根据静脉注射胰岛素的数据计算,吸入胰岛素的相对有效性为9.5±4.1%,皮下注射胰岛素的相对有效性为7.6±2.9%。吸入胰岛素起效迅速,可能具有临床应用潜力。