Suppr超能文献

可溶性胰岛素和赖脯胰岛素的肌内注射与皮下注射:健康受试者代谢效应的比较

Intramuscular versus subcutaneous injection of soluble and lispro insulin: comparison of metabolic effects in healthy subjects.

作者信息

Rave K, Heise T, Weyer C, Herrnberger J, Bender R, Hirschberger S, Heinemann L

机构信息

Department of Metabolic Diseases and Nutrition, WHO Collaborating Centre for Diabetes, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 1998 Sep;15(9):747-51. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199809)15:9<747::AID-DIA664>3.0.CO;2-V.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the glucodynamic effects of soluble insulin and the rapid acting insulin analogue insulin lispro after subcutaneous (s.c.) and intramuscular (i.m.) injection. Twelve healthy male volunteers (age 26.8 +/- 1.7 years, BMI 23.2 +/- 2.3 kg m(-2); mean +/- SD) participated in this single-centre, open-labelled, euglycaemic glucose clamp study on four different days. Soluble insulin or insulin lispro (0.2 U kg(-1)) were injected s.c. or i.m. into the thigh by syringe. The glucodynamic effects were assessed by registering the glucose infusion rates necessary to maintain blood glucose at 5.0 mmol l(-1) for the subsequent 420 min. Intramuscular injection of soluble insulin led to an earlier peak of metabolic action when compared to s.c. administered soluble insulin (tmax 138 +/- 29 vs 179 +/- 34 min; p < 0.05). The maximal metabolic effect and metabolic activity during the first 2 h after i.m. and s.c. injection of soluble insulin were comparable (GIRmax 9.7 +/- 2.3 vs 7.8 +/- 2.3 mg kg(-1) min(-1); n.s., AUC0-120min 0.60 +/- 0.18 vs 0.50 +/- 0.15 g kg(-1) 120 min; n.s.). Subcutaneous administration of insulin lispro led to a metabolic effect resembling that induced by i.m. application of soluble insulin (tmax 116 +/- 26 vs 138 +/- 29 min; n.s., GIRmax 11.1 +/- 2.3 mg vs 9.7 +/- mg kg(-1) min(-1); n.s.). However, the overall metabolic response during the first 2 h after injection was higher with s.c. insulin lispro (AUC0-120min 0.81 +/- 0.26 vs 0.60 +/- 0.18 g kg(-1) 120 min; p < 0.05). The glucodynamic activity of i.m. applied insulin lispro was comparable to that of lispro s.c.. Following i.m. injection of soluble insulin, the metabolic activity peaked more rapidly than with s.c. administration. In contrast, the metabolic effect of insulin lispro was similar with either route. The time-action profile of i.m. injected soluble insulin lies between that of s.c. applied soluble insulin and insulin lispro.

摘要

本研究旨在比较皮下(s.c.)和肌肉内(i.m.)注射可溶性胰岛素与速效胰岛素类似物赖脯胰岛素的糖代谢动力学效应。12名健康男性志愿者(年龄26.8±1.7岁,体重指数23.2±2.3 kg m⁻²;均值±标准差)在四个不同日期参与了这项单中心、开放标签、正常血糖葡萄糖钳夹研究。通过注射器将可溶性胰岛素或赖脯胰岛素(0.2 U kg⁻¹)s.c.或i.m.注射到大腿。通过记录在随后420分钟内将血糖维持在5.0 mmol l⁻¹所需的葡萄糖输注速率来评估糖代谢动力学效应。与s.c.注射可溶性胰岛素相比,i.m.注射可溶性胰岛素导致代谢作用的峰值出现得更早(达峰时间138±29分钟对179±34分钟;p<0.05)。i.m.和s.c.注射可溶性胰岛素后最初2小时内的最大代谢效应和代谢活性相当(最大葡萄糖输注速率9.7±2.3对7.8±2.3 mg kg⁻¹ min⁻¹;无显著差异,0至120分钟的曲线下面积0.60±0.18对0.50±0.15 g kg⁻¹ 120分钟;无显著差异)。s.c.注射赖脯胰岛素产生的代谢效应类似于i.m.注射可溶性胰岛素所诱导的效应(达峰时间116±26分钟对138±29分钟;无显著差异,最大葡萄糖输注速率11.1±2.3对9.7±mg kg⁻¹ min⁻¹;无显著差异)。然而,注射后最初2小时内s.c.注射赖脯胰岛素的总体代谢反应更高(0至120分钟的曲线下面积0.81±0.26对0.60±0.18 g kg⁻¹ 120分钟;p<0.05)。i.m.注射赖脯胰岛素的糖代谢动力学活性与s.c.注射赖脯胰岛素相当。i.m.注射可溶性胰岛素后,代谢活性比s.c.给药时更快达到峰值。相比之下,赖脯胰岛素经两种途径的代谢效应相似。i.m.注射可溶性胰岛素的时效曲线介于s.c.注射可溶性胰岛素和赖脯胰岛素之间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验