Benson L S, Ptaszek A J
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, USA.
J Hand Surg Am. 1997 Jan;22(1):138-44. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80194-7.
One hundred nine trigger fingers in 102 patients were reviewed with respect to management plan and response to treatment. Thirty-four digits eventually underwent surgical release of the A1 pulley, while the other 75 digits were treated with local steroid injection only. All patients were evaluated with respect to clinical resolution of symptoms, dollar cost of treatment, and general satisfaction as measured with a post-treatment questionnaire. These data suggest that surgical management may be the next best option in patients with trigger finger who continue to be symptomatic after a single injection. Although surgical release of the A1 pulley cost our Medicare patients $250.00 more than a second injection, this additional cost may be offset by the benefit conferred through permanency of relief. Subjective data from the patient questionnaire responses also support surgery as a reasonable choice after one injection failure. The information from this study better delineates differences between injection and surgery as treatment choices and may aid the patient and physician in choosing an individually optimal care plan.
我们回顾了102例患者的109根扳机指的治疗方案及治疗反应。其中34根手指最终接受了A1滑车松解手术,另外75根手指仅接受了局部类固醇注射治疗。所有患者均通过治疗后问卷评估症状的临床缓解情况、治疗费用以及总体满意度。这些数据表明,对于单次注射后仍有症状的扳机指患者,手术治疗可能是次优选择。尽管A1滑车松解手术比第二次注射治疗使我们的医疗保险患者多花费250美元,但这种额外费用可能会被永久缓解带来的益处所抵消。患者问卷反馈的主观数据也支持在一次注射治疗失败后选择手术治疗是合理的。本研究所得信息能更清晰地界定注射治疗和手术治疗作为不同治疗选择之间的差异,有助于患者和医生选择个体化的最佳治疗方案。