• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从叙述性数据中对机动车事故类别进行机器学习。

Machine learning of motor vehicle accident categories from narrative data.

作者信息

Lehto M R, Sorock G S

机构信息

School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.

出版信息

Methods Inf Med. 1996 Dec;35(4-5):309-16.

PMID:9019094
Abstract

Bayesian inferencing as a machine learning technique was evaluated for identifying pre-crash activity and crash type from accident narratives describing 3,686 motor vehicle crashes. It was hypothesized that a Bayesian model could learn from a computer search for 63 keywords related to accident categories. Learning was described in terms of the ability to accurately classify previously unclassifiable narratives not containing the original keywords. When narratives contained keywords, the results obtained using both the Bayesian model and keyword search corresponded closely to expert ratings (P(detection) > or = 0.9, and P (false positive) < or = 0.05). For narratives not containing keywords, when the threshold used by the Bayesian model was varied between p > 0.5 and p > 0.9, the overall probability of detecting a category assigned by the expert varied between 67% and 12%. False positives correspondingly varied between 32% and 3%. These latter results demonstrated that the Bayesian system learned from the results of the keyword searches.

摘要

作为一种机器学习技术,贝叶斯推理被用于从描述3686起机动车碰撞事故的事故叙述中识别碰撞前活动和碰撞类型。研究假设,贝叶斯模型可以从计算机搜索与事故类别相关的63个关键词中学习。学习是根据准确分类以前无法分类的、不包含原始关键词的叙述的能力来描述的。当叙述包含关键词时,使用贝叶斯模型和关键词搜索获得的结果与专家评级密切对应(检测概率P(detection)≥0.9,误报概率P(false positive)≤0.05)。对于不包含关键词的叙述,当贝叶斯模型使用的阈值在p>0.5和p>0.9之间变化时,检测到专家指定类别的总体概率在67%至12%之间变化。误报率相应地在32%至3%之间变化。后一组结果表明,贝叶斯系统从关键词搜索的结果中进行了学习。

相似文献

1
Machine learning of motor vehicle accident categories from narrative data.从叙述性数据中对机动车事故类别进行机器学习。
Methods Inf Med. 1996 Dec;35(4-5):309-16.
2
A combined Fuzzy and Naive Bayesian strategy can be used to assign event codes to injury narratives.一种组合的模糊和朴素贝叶斯策略可用于为伤害描述分配事件代码。
Inj Prev. 2011 Dec;17(6):407-14. doi: 10.1136/ip.2010.030593. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
3
Bayesian methods: a useful tool for classifying injury narratives into cause groups.贝叶斯方法:将伤害叙述分类为原因组的有用工具。
Inj Prev. 2009 Aug;15(4):259-65. doi: 10.1136/ip.2008.021337.
4
Computerized coding of injury narrative data from the National Health Interview Survey.来自美国国家健康访谈调查的伤害叙述数据的计算机编码。
Accid Anal Prev. 2004 Mar;36(2):165-71. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00146-x.
5
Crash narrative classification: Identifying agricultural crashes using machine learning with curated keywords.事故叙述分类:使用机器学习和精选关键词识别农业事故。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(1):74-78. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1836365. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
6
Severity of driver injury and vehicle damage in traffic crashes at intersections: a Bayesian hierarchical analysis.十字路口交通事故中驾驶员受伤程度与车辆损坏情况:一项贝叶斯层次分析
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Jan;40(1):45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.04.002. Epub 2007 May 2.
7
Analysis of traffic accident injury severity on Spanish rural highways using Bayesian networks.基于贝叶斯网络的西班牙农村公路交通事故伤害严重程度分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jan;43(1):402-11. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.09.010. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
8
Use of car crashes resulting in fatal and serious injuries to analyze a safe road transport system model and to identify system weaknesses.利用导致致命和重伤的车祸来分析安全道路运输系统模型并识别系统弱点。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2009 Oct;10(5):441-50. doi: 10.1080/15389580903081057.
9
Finding and understanding pedal misapplication crashes using a deep learning natural language model.利用深度学习自然语言模型发现和理解脚踏应用错误崩溃。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(sup1):S169-S172. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1982616. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
10
Two-vehicle injury severity models based on integration of pavement management and traffic engineering factors.基于路面管理和交通工程因素集成的两车事故严重程度模型。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(5):544-53. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.731547.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of a Machine Learning-Based Decision Support Tool to Improve an Injury Surveillance System Workflow.基于机器学习的决策支持工具在改进伤害监测系统工作流程中的应用。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 May;13(3):700-710. doi: 10.1055/a-1863-7176. Epub 2022 May 29.
2
Computerized "Learn-As-You-Go" classification of traumatic brain injuries using NEISS narrative data.利用国家电子伤害监督系统(NEISS)叙述性数据对创伤性脑损伤进行计算机化的“边学边分类”。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Apr;89:111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
3
Harnessing information from injury narratives in the 'big data' era: understanding and applying machine learning for injury surveillance.
在“大数据”时代利用伤害叙事中的信息:理解并应用机器学习进行伤害监测。
Inj Prev. 2016 Apr;22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i34-42. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041813. Epub 2016 Jan 4.