Abecassis M M, Koffron A J, Kaplan B, Buckingham M, Muldoon J P, Cribbins A J, Kaufman D B, Fryer J P, Stuart J, Stuart F P
Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.
Transplantation. 1997 Jan 27;63(2):275-9. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199701270-00017.
Cytomegalovirus remains a significant source of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised hosts. The increased sensitivity of molecular diagnostic techniques (PCR, antigenemia) has resulted in our ability to detect viral replication earlier in the posttransplant period, before the onset of symptoms. With the advent of effective antiviral therapy, "preemptive therapy," guided by sensitive, early and specific predictors of CMV disease, has become a realistic objective. Although multiple studies have analyzed the sensitivity and specificity of these tests, their predictive value for the development of disease has not been defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of a positive CMV PCR in the setting of solid abdominal organ transplantation. A total of 476 PCR assays were performed on 134 transplant recipients (102 kidney, 19 kidney/pancreas, 11 liver, 2 other) either as protocol serial samples or as dictated by clinical events. All samples were concomitantly analyzed using standard virological assays for CMV including culture, shell vial, and serology. Patients with any CMV seropositive donor/recipient (D/R) combination received ganciclovir prophylaxis in conjunction with antilymphocyte induction for 14 days. No subsequent CMV prophylaxis was used. The positive predictive value was 55% in all seropositive donor/recipient combinations. The highest risk group (seronegative recipient of seropositive donor) showed the highest positive predictive value, whereas seropositive recipients of either seropositive or seronegative donors showed positive predictive values of 45% and 25%, respectively. Negative predictive value was 100% for all groups. Early detection of CMV infection has important implications for patient management, including preemptive therapy, which can be guided by PCR, especially in high risk (D+/R-) patients.
巨细胞病毒仍然是免疫功能低下宿主发病和死亡的重要原因。分子诊断技术(PCR、抗原血症检测)敏感性的提高,使我们有能力在移植后时期症状出现之前更早地检测到病毒复制。随着有效抗病毒治疗的出现,以巨细胞病毒疾病敏感、早期和特异的预测指标为指导的“抢先治疗”已成为一个现实目标。尽管多项研究分析了这些检测的敏感性和特异性,但它们对疾病发生的预测价值尚未明确。本研究的目的是评估在腹部实体器官移植情况下,巨细胞病毒PCR检测呈阳性的预测价值。对134例移植受者(102例肾移植、19例肾/胰腺联合移植、11例肝移植、2例其他移植)进行了总共476次PCR检测,检测样本为方案规定的系列样本或由临床事件决定。所有样本同时使用针对巨细胞病毒的标准病毒学检测方法进行分析,包括培养、空斑试验和血清学检测。任何巨细胞病毒血清学阳性供体/受体(D/R)组合的患者在接受抗淋巴细胞诱导治疗的同时接受14天的更昔洛韦预防治疗。后续不再使用巨细胞病毒预防治疗。在所有血清学阳性供体/受体组合中,阳性预测值为55%。风险最高的组(血清学阳性供体的血清学阴性受体)显示出最高的阳性预测值,而血清学阳性供体或血清学阴性供体的血清学阳性受体的阳性预测值分别为45%和25%。所有组的阴性预测值均为100%。巨细胞病毒感染的早期检测对患者管理具有重要意义,包括可由PCR指导的抢先治疗,尤其是在高风险(D+/R-)患者中。