Losken H W, Patterson G T, Tate D, Coit D W
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Craniofac Surg. 1995 Sep;6(5):395-400. doi: 10.1097/00001665-199509000-00015.
In planning mandibular distraction, the deficiency of the vertical ramus and body is measured. The position of the pin placement is evaluated by the following formula: [formula: see text] This is more accurately presented by the new formula. [formula: see text] In one patient the original formula evaluated the pin placement angle to be 9.94, compared with 9.92, in the more accurate but more complex new formula. When the gonial angle is obtuse, the difference is small. When the gonial angle is more acute, as in a normal gonial angle for a 2-year-old child--134 degrees--the difference is still only 0.1 degree. The original formula is simpler to use and is accurate enough for clinical use in mandibular distraction. The distraction distance is not the sum of the vertical ramal deficiency plus the body deficiency but is given by the following formula: [formula: see text] It would be accurate enough to plan the total distraction distance to be less than the sum of the two distances. The more acute the gonial angle is, the less the distraction distance will need to be.
在计划下颌骨牵张成骨时,需测量下颌支和下颌体的垂直缺损。通过以下公式评估克氏针置入位置:[公式:见原文] 新公式能更准确地呈现这一情况。[公式:见原文] 在一名患者中,原公式评估的克氏针置入角度为9.94,而更精确但更复杂的新公式得出的角度为9.92。当下颌角为钝角时,差异较小。当下颌角更尖锐时,比如两岁儿童正常下颌角为134度时,差异仍仅为0.1度。原公式使用更简便,对于下颌骨牵张成骨的临床应用而言足够准确。牵张距离并非下颌支垂直缺损与下颌体缺损之和,而是由以下公式给出:[公式:见原文] 将总的牵张距离计划为小于这两个距离之和就足够准确。下颌角越尖锐,所需的牵张距离就越小。