Cheney M L, Gliklich R, Li K K, Topf P, Montgomery W
Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary/Harvard Medical School, Boston 02114, USA.
J Craniofac Surg. 1995 Sep;6(5):408-11.
The coronal incision has established itself as the principal surgical approach to the forehead. It allows for a well-hidden scar and a wide field of surgical exposure. The midforehead incision, described in the brow-lift literature, is a cosmetically acceptable alternative to the coronal incision for patients with forehead wrinkles or who are at risk for male pattern baldness. In an analysis of 33 consecutive open frontal sinus procedures, we compared patients who underwent i coronal approach to a midforehead approach for operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and cosmetic result. There was a trend toward decreased operative time and decreased blood loss with the midforehead approach. The cosmetic result was acceptable in all patients. We advocate the use of a midforehead approach to the frontal sinus in patients with deep forehead creases and with hairline recession and elderly or infirmed patients who cannot tolerate prolonged procedures or significant blood loss.
冠状切口已成为前额的主要手术入路。它能形成隐蔽的瘢痕且手术视野开阔。在额部提升文献中描述的前额中部切口,对于有前额皱纹或有男性型秃发风险的患者而言,是一种在美容方面可接受的冠状切口替代方法。在对33例连续的开放性额窦手术进行分析时,我们比较了采用冠状入路与前额中部入路的患者在手术时间、失血量、住院时间和美容效果方面的情况。前额中部入路有手术时间缩短和失血量减少的趋势。所有患者的美容效果均可接受。我们主张,对于有深前额皱纹、发际线后移的患者,以及不能耐受长时间手术或大量失血的老年或体弱患者,采用前额中部入路处理额窦。