Suppr超能文献

香港对麻醉品成瘾者进行美沙酮维持治疗与安慰剂维持治疗的双盲比较。

Double-blind comparison of methadone and placebo maintenance treatments of narcotic addicts in Hong Kong.

作者信息

Newman R G, Whitehill W B

出版信息

Lancet. 1979 Sep 8;2(8141):485-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(79)91550-2.

Abstract

In a double-blind study carried out between 1972 and 1975 in Hong Kong 100 heroin addict volunteers were initially admitted to hospital for two weeks for stabilisation on 60 mg of methadone before being assigned at random to two groups: one group received methadone (range 30--130 mg, average 97 mg/day); those in the other group had their dose of methadone reduced at the rate of 1 mg/day and were then maintained on placebo. All subjects were provided with a broad range of supportive services. After thirty-two weeks 10% of the controls were still on treatment, compared with 76% of those receiving methadone. At the end of the three-year project, only 1 of the original 50 placebo subjects still turned up for treatment (2%), whereas the retention-rate (proportion still on treatment) for methadone subjects was 56%. Subjects who had dropped out of the study and were readmitted for methadone treatment under known conditions had the same retention-rate as the original treatment group.

摘要

1972年至1975年间在香港进行的一项双盲研究中,100名海洛因成瘾志愿者最初入院两周,服用60毫克美沙酮以实现身体稳定,之后被随机分为两组:一组接受美沙酮治疗(剂量范围为30 - 130毫克,平均每天97毫克);另一组的美沙酮剂量以每天1毫克的速度递减,然后服用安慰剂维持。所有受试者都获得了广泛的支持性服务。32周后,对照组中10%的人仍在接受治疗,而接受美沙酮治疗的人这一比例为76%。在该三年项目结束时,最初的50名服用安慰剂的受试者中只有1人仍前来接受治疗(2%),而美沙酮组的留存率(仍在接受治疗的比例)为56%。那些退出研究并在已知条件下重新入院接受美沙酮治疗的受试者,其留存率与最初的治疗组相同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验