Bickel W K, Stitzer M L, Bigelow G E, Liebson I A, Jasinski D R, Johnson R E
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1988 Jan;43(1):72-8. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1988.13.
The efficacy of buprenorphine and methadone was compared in the outpatient detoxification of heroin addicts. Forty-five patients were randomized to receive either sublingual buprenorphine or oral methadone under double-dummy and double-blind conditions to study the pharmacology of buprenorphine in a 90-day detoxification protocol. The patients were administered either 2 mg buprenorphine or 30 mg methadone for 3 weeks followed by 4 weeks of dose reductions and 6 weeks of placebo medication. No significant between-group differences were seen on measures of treatment retention, drug use, or symptom report. During the hydromorphone challenge, methadone attenuated opioid effects to a greater extent than did buprenorphine on both physiologic (pupil constriction) and self-report measures. However, this did not result in greater abuse of illicit opioid drugs by subjects taking buprenorphine. The results of this clinical trial indicated that buprenorphine was acceptable to patients and as effective as methadone in the detoxification treatment of heroin addicts.
在海洛因成瘾者的门诊戒毒治疗中,对丁丙诺啡和美沙酮的疗效进行了比较。45名患者在双模拟和双盲条件下被随机分配接受舌下含服丁丙诺啡或口服美沙酮,以在90天的戒毒方案中研究丁丙诺啡的药理学特性。患者服用2毫克丁丙诺啡或30毫克美沙酮,持续3周,随后4周逐渐减少剂量,并进行6周的安慰剂治疗。在治疗保留率、药物使用或症状报告方面,未观察到显著的组间差异。在氢吗啡酮激发试验中,在生理指标(瞳孔收缩)和自我报告指标方面,美沙酮比丁丙诺啡更能减轻阿片类药物的作用。然而,这并未导致服用丁丙诺啡的受试者对非法阿片类药物的滥用增加。该临床试验结果表明,丁丙诺啡为患者所接受,在海洛因成瘾者的戒毒治疗中与美沙酮效果相当。