Yirmiya N, Shulman C
Department of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Israel.
Child Dev. 1996 Oct;67(5):2045-59.
Seriation, conservation, and theory of mind abilities were examined in individuals with autism (N = 16), mental retardation (N = 16), and in normally developing children (N = 16). Seriation tasks included seriation of tubes, blocks, and flat squares. Conservation tasks included conservation of area, number, substance, quantity, and weight. Theory of mind tasks involved predicting false belief and understanding value and fact beliefs. Participants with autism performed better than participants with mental retardation on seriation, while no differences emerged between these groups on conservation and false belief. Individuals with autism performed less well than individuals with mental retardation on the value and fact belief tasks; however, when verbal ability was held as a covariant, the difference was no longer significant. Normally developing children performed better than the other two groups on all tasks. These results suggest that autism does not involve a specific impairment in theory of mind and that theory of mind deficits are not unique to autism.
对患有自闭症的个体(N = 16)、智力迟钝的个体(N = 16)以及正常发育的儿童(N = 16)进行了序列化、守恒和心理理论能力的测试。序列化任务包括对管子、积木和平板正方形进行排序。守恒任务包括面积、数量、物质、数量和重量的守恒。心理理论任务涉及预测错误信念以及理解价值信念和事实信念。自闭症患者在序列化任务上的表现优于智力迟钝患者,而在守恒和错误信念方面,这两组之间没有差异。自闭症患者在价值信念和事实信念任务上的表现不如智力迟钝患者;然而,当将语言能力作为协变量时,差异不再显著。正常发育的儿童在所有任务上的表现都优于其他两组。这些结果表明,自闭症并不涉及心理理论的特定损伤,并且心理理论缺陷并非自闭症所特有。