Bobo J K, Anderson J R, Bowman A
Department of Preventive and Societal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68198-4350, USA.
Addict Behav. 1997 Jan-Feb;22(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(95)00101-8.
To test the effectiveness of providing chemical dependency (CD) staff with a knowledge-and-skills-building workshop on treatment of nicotine dependence, we employed a nested cross-sectional design with six outpatient CD programs in Nebraska (3 intervention, 3 control sites). Data on tobacco counseling provided by CD staff were obtained by telephone from sequential samples of smokers currently receiving alcohol treatment at each participating site. Intervention site clients with clinic visits after the staff training workshop were no more likely than intervention-site clients with clinic visits before the workshop to report having been counseled about their smoking (OR = 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-1.21). However, control-site clients were significantly more likely to report having been counseled about smoking during the second half of the study (OR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.49-3.08), even though staff training was not provided at control sites until data collection had been completed. These findings suggest that in some alcohol treatment programs simple monitoring of staff counseling practices may be sufficient to increase the frequency of attention to tobacco. In others, more intensive efforts might be needed to shift CD staff toward more consistent treatment of nicotine dependence.
为了测试为药物依赖(CD)工作人员提供关于尼古丁依赖治疗的知识与技能培训工作坊的有效性,我们采用了嵌套横断面设计,在内布拉斯加州选取了六个门诊药物依赖项目(3个干预点,3个对照点)。通过电话从每个参与点正在接受酒精治疗的吸烟者序列样本中获取CD工作人员提供的烟草咨询数据。在工作人员培训工作坊之后进行门诊就诊的干预点客户,与在工作坊之前进行门诊就诊的干预点客户相比,报告接受过吸烟咨询的可能性并无差异(比值比(OR)=0.95,95%置信区间(CI):0.74 - 1.21)。然而,对照点客户在研究后半段报告接受过吸烟咨询的可能性显著更高(OR = 2.15,95% CI:1.49 - 3.08),尽管在完成数据收集之前对照点并未提供工作人员培训。这些发现表明,在一些酒精治疗项目中,简单监测工作人员的咨询实践可能足以提高对烟草问题的关注频率。而在其他项目中,可能需要更深入的努力,以使CD工作人员更持续地治疗尼古丁依赖。