Williams R
Institute of Hepatology, University College London Medical School, United Kingdom.
Semin Liver Dis. 1996 Nov;16(4):343-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1007247.
Clinical descriptions of fulminant hepatic failure as originally reported, along with the subgroups of subfulminant and late onset hepatic failure identified later, are considered in relation to the proposed new classification of hyperacute, acute, and subacute liver failure. This reflects different clinical patterns of illness, etiology, and most importantly, prognosis. In addition to the defining state of encephalopathy and other manifestations directly related to the severe derangement in function and structure of the liver, the constellation of clinical symptoms and signs in acute liver failure (ALF) includes, to varying degrees, those of multiorgan failure. The latter develops because of tissue hypoxia from microcirculatory changes consequent on endotoxemia, and activation of macrophages and release of cytokines as a result of secondary bacteria infection due to an early failure of host defenses to infection in ALF. Paracetamol overdose-the commonest cause of acute liver failure in the United Kingdom-is increasing in frequency in other Western countries, but fulminant viral hepatitis is the most frequent etiology worldwide. Marked geographical variations are seen in the frequency with which the viral types A to E are implicated. Whereas hepatitis C is the major cause of ALF in Japan and the Far East, fulminant hepatitis C is seen rarely in America and European countries where most series show that in about one third of cases of presumed viral ALF, no specific agent can be identified. Over the past 10 years, the survival of those with grade 3 to 4 encephalopathy has shown a steady rise as a result of improvements in medical care, quite apart from the introduction and now widespread availability of transplantation for the treatment of this condition. As shown by a number of groups, a variety of different hematologic, biochemical, and clinical features can be used as predictive indices of the likely outcome and in determining the approach to treatment.
本文结合新提出的超急性、急性和亚急性肝衰竭分类,对最初报道的暴发性肝衰竭的临床描述以及后来确定的亚暴发性和迟发性肝衰竭亚组进行了探讨。这反映了不同的临床疾病模式、病因,以及最重要的预后情况。除了肝性脑病的定义状态和其他与肝脏功能和结构严重紊乱直接相关的表现外,急性肝衰竭(ALF)的临床症状和体征还不同程度地包括多器官衰竭的症状。后者是由于内毒素血症导致微循环变化引起的组织缺氧,以及急性肝衰竭患者宿主防御感染早期失败继发细菌感染导致巨噬细胞活化和细胞因子释放所致。对乙酰氨基酚过量是英国急性肝衰竭最常见的原因,在其他西方国家其发生率也在增加,但暴发性病毒性肝炎是全球最常见的病因。不同病毒类型(A至E型)导致急性肝衰竭的频率存在明显的地域差异。丙型肝炎是日本和远东地区急性肝衰竭的主要原因,而在美国和欧洲国家,暴发性丙型肝炎很少见,大多数系列研究表明,在约三分之一的疑似病毒性急性肝衰竭病例中,无法确定具体病因。在过去10年中,由于医疗护理的改善,3至4级肝性脑病患者的生存率稳步上升,这与肝移植治疗这种疾病的引入及现在的广泛应用无关。许多研究小组表明,多种不同的血液学、生化和临床特征可作为可能预后的预测指标,并用于确定治疗方法。