• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

受限自组织在基因组结构进化中的作用。

The role of constrained self-organization in genome structural evolution.

作者信息

von Sternberg R

机构信息

Center for Intelligent Systems, T.J. Watson School, State University of New York at Binghamton 13902, USA.

出版信息

Acta Biotheor. 1996 Jun;44(2):95-118. doi: 10.1007/BF00048418.

DOI:10.1007/BF00048418
PMID:9028019
Abstract

A hypothesis of genome structural evolution is explored. Rapid and cohesive alterations in genome organization are viewed as resulting from the dynamic and constrained interactions of chromosomal subsystem components. A combination of macromolecular boundary conditions and DNA element involvement in far-from-equilibrium reactions is proposed to increase the complexity of genomic subsystems via the channelling of genome turnover; interactions between subsystems create higher-order subsystems expanding the phase space for further genetic evolution. The operation of generic constraints on structuration in genome evolution is suggested by i) universal, homoplasic features of chromosome organization and ii) the metastable nature of genome structures where lower-level flux is constrained by higher-order structures. Phenomena such as 'genomic shock', bursts of transposable element activity, concerted evolution, etc., are hypothesized to result from constrained systemic responses to endogenous/exogenous, micro/macro perturbations. The constraints operating on genome turnover are expected to increase with chromosomal structural complexity, the number of interacting subsystems, and the degree to which interactions between genomic components are tightly ordered.

摘要

本文探讨了一种基因组结构进化的假说。基因组组织中快速且连贯的变化被视为染色体子系统组件动态且受限相互作用的结果。有人提出,大分子边界条件与DNA元件参与远离平衡反应相结合,可通过引导基因组更新来增加基因组子系统的复杂性;子系统之间的相互作用会产生更高阶的子系统,从而扩展进一步遗传进化的相空间。基因组进化中结构形成的一般约束作用体现在:(i)染色体组织的普遍、同源特征;(ii)基因组结构的亚稳态性质,即较低水平的通量受到高阶结构的约束。诸如“基因组休克”、转座元件活性爆发、协同进化等现象,被假定为由对内源/外源、微观/宏观扰动的受限系统反应所导致。预计作用于基因组更新的约束会随着染色体结构复杂性、相互作用子系统的数量以及基因组组件之间相互作用紧密有序的程度而增加。

相似文献

1
The role of constrained self-organization in genome structural evolution.受限自组织在基因组结构进化中的作用。
Acta Biotheor. 1996 Jun;44(2):95-118. doi: 10.1007/BF00048418.
2
Chromosomal distribution and evolution of repetitive DNAs in fish.鱼类中重复DNA的染色体分布与进化
Genome Dyn. 2012;7:197-221. doi: 10.1159/000337950. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
3
How the genome readies itself for evolution.基因组如何为进化做好准备。
Science. 1998 Aug 21;281(5380):1131,1133-4. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5380.1131.
4
BAC end sequences and a physical map reveal transposable element content and clustering patterns in the genome of Magnaporthe grisea.BAC末端序列和物理图谱揭示了稻瘟病菌基因组中的转座元件含量和聚类模式。
Fungal Genet Biol. 2004 Jul;41(7):657-66. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2004.02.003.
5
Interactions among genomic structure, function, and evolution revealed by comprehensive analysis of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome.通过对拟南芥基因组的全面分析揭示的基因组结构、功能和进化之间的相互作用。
Genomics. 2006 Oct;88(4):394-406. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.05.003. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
6
The repetitive DNA landscape in Avena (Poaceae): chromosome and genome evolution defined by major repeat classes in whole-genome sequence reads.燕麦属(禾本科)中的重复 DNA 景观:通过全基因组序列读取中的主要重复类定义染色体和基因组进化。
BMC Plant Biol. 2019 May 30;19(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1769-z.
7
The role of transposable element clusters in genome evolution and loss of synteny in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae.转座元件簇在稻瘟病菌基因组进化及共线性丧失中的作用
Genome Biol. 2006;7(2):R16. doi: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-2-r16. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
8
Transposable elements and the evolution of genome organization in mammals.转座元件与哺乳动物基因组组织的进化
Genetica. 1992;86(1-3):287-93. doi: 10.1007/BF00133727.
9
Transposable elements and the evolution of genome size in eukaryotes.转座元件与真核生物基因组大小的进化
Genetica. 2002 May;115(1):49-63. doi: 10.1023/a:1016072014259.
10
Highly efficient concerted evolution in the ribosomal DNA repeats: total rDNA repeat variation revealed by whole-genome shotgun sequence data.核糖体DNA重复序列中的高效协同进化:全基因组鸟枪法序列数据揭示的总rDNA重复序列变异
Genome Res. 2007 Feb;17(2):184-91. doi: 10.1101/gr.5457707. Epub 2007 Jan 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Activation of the maize transposable element Suppressor-mutator (Spm) in tissue culture.玉米转座因子 Suppressor-mutator(Spm)在组织培养中的激活。
Theor Appl Genet. 1991 Jan;81(1):90-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00226117.
2
Why is the house mouse karyotype so variable?为什么家鼠的染色体核型如此多变?
Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 Oct;10(10):397-402. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)89155-7.
3
Organization of mutations along the genome: a prime determinant of genome evolution.基因突变的组织方式:基因组进化的主要决定因素。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 Feb;9(2):65-9. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90277-1.
4
The meaning of natural selection revisited at the molecular level.在分子水平上重新审视自然选择的意义。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1992 Sep;7(9):311-2. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(92)90230-9.
5
SINEs: Short interspersed repeated elements of the eukaryotic genome.SINEs:真核生物基因组中的短散在重复元件。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1991 Nov;6(11):358-61. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(91)90226-N.
6
Hypervariable Bkm DNA Loci in a Moth, Ephestia kuehniella : Does Transposition Cause Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism?鳞翅目昆虫黄粉甲中高度可变的 Bkm DNA 位点:转座是否引起限制片段长度多态性?
Genetics. 1987 Mar;115(3):493-8. doi: 10.1093/genetics/115.3.493.
7
The significance of responses of the genome to challenge.基因组对挑战做出反应的意义。
Science. 1984 Nov 16;226(4676):792-801. doi: 10.1126/science.15739260.
8
Heterochromatin and gene expression in Drosophila.果蝇中的异染色质与基因表达
Annu Rev Genet. 1995;29:577-605. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.29.120195.003045.
9
The human genome: organization and evolutionary history.人类基因组:组织与进化史
Annu Rev Genet. 1995;29:445-76. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.29.120195.002305.
10
The Polycomb and trithorax group proteins of Drosophila: trans-regulators of homeotic gene function.果蝇的多梳蛋白和三胸蛋白家族:同源异型基因功能的反式调节因子。
Annu Rev Genet. 1995;29:289-303. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.29.120195.001445.