• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卷尾猴的空间构建

Spatial constructions by capuchin monkeys.

作者信息

Potì P

机构信息

Istituto di Psicologia, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Ist Super Sanita. 1996;32(3):361-7.

PMID:9028058
Abstract

Spontaneous object grouping by two capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) ranging from 1 to 4 years of age was investigated. Subjects' spontaneous interactions with groups of objects were recorded. Similarly to human infants and chimpanzees, capuchins increased with age the size of groups, the rate of vertical constructions, and of contemporaneous groups, i.e., of groups made simultaneously or close to another. However, capuchins lagged behind human infants and, partly, to chimpanzees in that they failed to develop alignments of objects, or spatial correspondences between contemporaneous groups. Capuchins' constructive processes were similar to those of chimpanzees and different from those of human infants. Nonhuman primates increasingly manipulate objects together with the same part of their body. In these instances, no specific spatial relations among objects as detached units are detectable. In fact, objects are related to one another only incidentally to the simultaneous relations of each object to the self. Therefore, nonhuman primates increasingly manipulate objects in relation to their body.

摘要

对两只年龄在1至4岁之间的卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)的自发物体分组行为进行了研究。记录了实验对象与物体组的自发互动情况。与人类婴儿和黑猩猩类似,卷尾猴随着年龄增长,所分组的物体数量增加,垂直搭建的速度加快,同时搭建的群组数量也增加,即同时或接近同时搭建的群组数量增加。然而,卷尾猴在物体排列或同时搭建的群组之间的空间对应关系方面落后于人类婴儿,在一定程度上也落后于黑猩猩。卷尾猴的搭建过程与黑猩猩相似,与人类婴儿不同。非人类灵长类动物越来越多地用身体的同一部位一起操作物体。在这些情况下,作为独立单元的物体之间没有可检测到的特定空间关系。事实上,物体之间的相互关系只是每个物体与自身同时关系的附带结果。因此,非人类灵长类动物越来越多地根据身体来操作物体。

相似文献

1
Spatial constructions by capuchin monkeys.卷尾猴的空间构建
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 1996;32(3):361-7.
2
Ontogeny of manipulative behavior and nut-cracking in young tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): a perception-action perspective.幼年簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)操纵行为和坚果开裂行为的个体发生:一种感知-行动视角
Dev Sci. 2008 Nov;11(6):828-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00731.x.
3
Relational spatial reasoning by a nonhuman: the example of capuchin monkeys.非人类的关系性空间推理:卷尾猴的例子。
Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2005 Dec;4(4):282-306. doi: 10.1177/1534582306286573.
4
Object-use in free-ranging white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus) in Costa Rica.哥斯达黎加野生白面卷尾猴(Cebus capucinus)的物体使用情况
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1998 Jul;106(3):311-21. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199807)106:3<311::AID-AJPA4>3.0.CO;2-P.
5
How capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) quantify objects and substances.卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)如何量化物体和物质。
J Comp Psychol. 2006 Nov;120(4):416-26. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.120.4.416.
6
Picture processing in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).簇绒卷尾猴(白喉卷尾猴)的图像处理
Behav Processes. 2009 Oct;82(2):140-52. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
7
Categorization of above and below spatial relations by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴)对空间关系上下的分类。
J Comp Psychol. 2004 Dec;118(4):403-12. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.118.4.403.
8
Transport of tools to food sites in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)将工具运输到食物地点的行为
Anim Cogn. 2004 Jul;7(3):193-8. doi: 10.1007/s10071-004-0213-3. Epub 2004 Mar 12.
9
Searching in the middle-Capuchins' (Cebus apella) and bonobos' (Pan paniscus) behavior during a spatial search task.在空间搜索任务中对卷尾猴(僧帽猴,Cebus apella)和倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)行为的研究。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Jan;36(1):92-109. doi: 10.1037/a0015970.
10
The relative use of proximity, shape similarity, and orientation as visual perceptual grouping cues in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and humans (Homo sapiens).簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)和人类(智人)将接近度、形状相似性和方向作为视觉感知分组线索的相对运用情况。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Feb;123(1):56-68. doi: 10.1037/a0012674.