Reinhardt J W, Boyer D B, Stephens N H
University of Iowa, College of Dentistry, Department of Operative Dentistry, Iowa City 52242, USA.
Oper Dent. 1994 Nov-Dec;19(6):217-20.
This study was designed to compare strength, elastic modulus (stiffness), and hardness for five composite resin materials that are used for laboratory-fabricated posterior composite restorations. Ten specimens of each material were processed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Statistical analysis indicated that there were significant differences in mechanical properties among the materials tested. In addition, materials that are incrementally light cured prior to secondary processing were tested for changes in mechanical properties following secondary processing. It was determined that secondary processing provided improvement in flexural strength (11%) when compared to samples that were only light cured.
本研究旨在比较用于实验室制作的后牙复合树脂修复体的五种复合树脂材料的强度、弹性模量(刚度)和硬度。每种材料制作十个标本,并按照制造商的说明进行处理。统计分析表明,所测试材料的机械性能存在显著差异。此外,对在二次加工前进行分步光固化的材料进行二次加工后机械性能变化的测试。结果表明,与仅进行光固化的样品相比,二次加工使弯曲强度提高了11%。