Lemoli R M, Tafuri A, Fortuna A, Petrucci M T, Ricciardi M R, Catani L, Rondelli D, Fogli M, Leopardi G, Ariola C, Tura S
Institute of Hematology L. & A. Seràgnoli, University of Bologna, Italy.
Blood. 1997 Feb 15;89(4):1189-96.
In this study, we assessed the functional and kinetic characteristics of highly purified hematopoietic CD34+ cells from the apheresis products of 16 normal donors undergoing glycosylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment for peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) mobilization and transplantation in allogeneic recipients. Mobilized CD34+ cells were evaluated for their colony-forming capacity and trilineage proliferative response to selected recombinant human (rh) CSF in vitro and the content of very primitive long-term culture initiating cells (LTC-IC). In addition, the cycling status of circulating CD34+ cells, including committed clonogenic progenitor cells and the more immature LTC-IC, was determined by the cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) suicide test and the acridine orange flow cytometric technique. By comparison, bone marrow (BM) CD34+ cells from the same individuals were studied under steady-state conditions and during G-CSF administration. Clonogenic assays in methylcellulose showed the same frequency of colony-forming unit cells (CFU-C) when PB-primed CD34+ cells and BM cells were stimulated with phytohemagglutinin-lymphocyte-conditioned medium (PHA-LCM). However, mobilized CD34+ cells were significantly more responsive than their steady-state BM counterparts to interleukin-3 (IL-3) and stem cell factor (SCF) combined with G-CSF or IL-3 in presence of erythropoietin (Epo). In cultures added with SCF, IL-3, and Epo, we found a mean increase of 1.5- +/- 1-fold (standard error of the mean [SEM]) of PB CFU-granulocyte-macrophage and erythroid progenitors (burst-forming units-erythroid) as compared with BM CD34+ cells (P < .05). Conversely, circulating and BM megakaryocyte precursors (CFU-megakaryocyte) showed the same clonogenic efficiency in response to IL-3, granulocyte-macrophage-CSF and IL-3, IL-6, and Epo. After 5 weeks of liquid culture supported by the engineered murine stromal cell line M2-10B4 to produce G-CSF and IL-3, we reported 48.2 +/- 35 (SEM) and 62.5 +/- 54 (SEM) LTC-IC per 10(4) CD34+ cells in PB and steady-state BM, respectively (P = not significant). The Ara-C suicide assay showed that 4% +/- 5% (standard deviation [SD]) of committed precursors and 1% +/- 3% (SEM) of LTC-IC in PB are in S-phase as compared with 25.5% +/- 12% (SD) and 21% +/- 8% (SEM) of baseline BM, respectively (P < .001). However, longer incubation with Ara-C (16 to 18 hours), in the presence of SCF, IL-3 and G-CSF, or IL-6, showed that more than 60% of LTC-IC are actually cycling, with no difference being found with BM cells. Furthermore, studies of cell-cycle distribution on PB and BM CD34+ cells confirmed the low number of circulating progenitor cells in S- and G2M-phase, whereas simultaneous DNA/RNA analysis showed that the majority of PB CD34+ cells are not quiescent (ie, in G0-phase), being in G1-phase with a significant difference with baseline and G-CSF-treated BM (80% +/- 5% [SEM] v 61.9% +/- 6% [SEM] and 48% +/- 4% [SEM], respectively; P < .05). Moreover, G-CSF administration prevented apoptosis in a small but significant proportion of mobilized CD34+ cells. Thus, our results indicate that mobilized and BM CD34+ cells can be considered equivalent for the frequency of both committed and more immature hematopoietic progenitor cells, although they show different kinetic and functional profiles. In contrast with previous reports, we found that PB CD34+ cells, including very primitive LTC-IC, are cycling and ready to progress into S-phase under CSF stimulation. This finding should be taken into account for a better understanding of PBSC transplantation.
在本研究中,我们评估了16名正常供者经糖基化粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)治疗以动员外周血干细胞(PBSC)并用于异基因受者移植的单采产物中高度纯化的造血CD34+细胞的功能和动力学特征。对动员的CD34+细胞进行体外集落形成能力和对选定重组人(rh)CSF的三系增殖反应评估,以及极原始的长期培养起始细胞(LTC-IC)含量评估。此外,通过阿糖胞苷(Ara-C)自杀试验和吖啶橙流式细胞术确定循环CD34+细胞的周期状态,包括定向克隆祖细胞和更不成熟的LTC-IC。作为对照,研究了同一供者在稳态条件下以及G-CSF给药期间的骨髓(BM)CD34+细胞。甲基纤维素中的克隆形成试验表明,当用植物血凝素淋巴细胞条件培养基(PHA-LCM)刺激外周血启动的CD34+细胞和BM细胞时,集落形成单位细胞(CFU-C)频率相同。然而,动员的CD34+细胞对白细胞介素-3(IL-3)和干细胞因子(SCF)联合G-CSF或存在促红细胞生成素(Epo)时的IL-3的反应明显高于其稳态BM对应细胞。在添加SCF、IL-3和Epo的培养物中,我们发现与BM CD34+细胞相比,外周血CFU-粒细胞-巨噬细胞和红系祖细胞(爆式红系集落形成单位)平均增加1.5±1倍(均值标准误[SEM])(P<0.05)。相反,循环和BM巨核细胞前体(CFU-巨核细胞)对IL-3、粒细胞-巨噬细胞-CSF以及IL-3、IL-6和Epo的反应显示出相同的克隆形成效率。在用工程化小鼠基质细胞系M2-10B4支持以产生G-CSF和IL-3的液体培养5周后,我们报告外周血和稳态BM中每10⁴个CD34+细胞分别有48.2±35(SEM)和6(SEM)个LTC-IC(P=无显著性差异)。Ara-C自杀试验表明,外周血中4%±5%(标准差[SD])的定向前体和1%±3%(SEM)的LTC-IC处于S期,而基线BM分别为25.5%±12%(SD)和21%±8%(SEM)(P<0.001)。然而,在存在SCF、IL-3和G-CSF或IL-6的情况下,用Ara-C更长时间孵育(16至18小时)表明,超过60%的LTC-IC实际上在循环,与BM细胞无差异。此外,对外周血和BM CD34+细胞的细胞周期分布研究证实,循环祖细胞处于S期和G2M期的数量较少,而同时进行的DNA/RNA分析表明,大多数外周血CD34+细胞并非静止(即处于G0期),而是处于G1期,与基线和G-CSF处理的BM有显著差异(分别为80%±5%[SEM]对61.9%±6%[SEM]和48%±4%[SEM];P<0.05)。此外,G-CSF给药可防止一小部分但显著比例的动员CD34+细胞发生凋亡。因此,我们的结果表明,尽管动员的和BM CD34+细胞显示出不同的动力学和功能特征,但就定向和更不成熟造血祖细胞的频率而言,可认为它们是等效的。与先前的报告相反,我们发现外周血CD34+细胞,包括极原始的LTC-IC,在CSF刺激下处于循环状态并准备进入S期。为更好地理解PBSC移植,应考虑这一发现。