de Arriba F, Lozano M L, Ortuño F, Heras I, Moraleda J M, Vicente V
Unit of Haematology and Haemotherapy, School of Medicine, Hospital General Universitario, Murcia, Spain.
Br J Haematol. 1997 Feb;96(2):418-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.d01-2029.x.
Thirty patients diagnosed with breast cancer were included in a prospective randomized study comparing the in vivo priming effect of bioequivalent doses of glycosylated (lenograstim) and nonglycosylated (filgrastim) rG-CSF administration. Analysis of the efficacy of equivalent biological doses of both rG-CSFs showed no significant differences either in the mobilization of the subpopulations of PBPC considered (CD34+, CD34+/38-, CD34+/DR-), the content of such CD34+ cell subsets in the leukapheresis product, or the cost of the mobilization and collection procedures between both recombinant molecules. These results suggest that priming with bioequivalent doses of the two commercially available forms of glycosylated or nonglycosylated rG-CSF has a similar in vivo effect on PBPC mobilization.
30例被诊断为乳腺癌的患者被纳入一项前瞻性随机研究,该研究比较了生物等效剂量的糖基化(来格司亭)和非糖基化(非格司亭)重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(rG-CSF)给药的体内启动效应。对两种rG-CSF等效生物学剂量的疗效分析表明,在所考虑的外周血祖细胞亚群(CD34+、CD34+/38-、CD34+/DR-)的动员方面、白细胞分离产品中此类CD34+细胞亚群的含量方面,或两种重组分子之间的动员和采集程序成本方面,均无显著差异。这些结果表明,用两种市售形式的糖基化或非糖基化rG-CSF的生物等效剂量进行启动,对外周血祖细胞动员具有相似的体内效应。