• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Clinical evaluation of an anterior hybrid composite resin over 8 years.

作者信息

Millar B J, Robinson P B, Inglis A T

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry, King's Dental Institute, London.

出版信息

Br Dent J. 1997 Jan 11;182(1):26-30. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809289.

DOI:10.1038/sj.bdj.4809289
PMID:9029809
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the performance of an anterior hybrid composite resin restorative material (Opalux).

DESIGN

Single-centre clinical trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Scores were obtained based on USPHS criteria for marginal adaptation, anatomic form, colour match, surface roughness and marginal discolouration.

INTERVENTIONS

The restorative material was evaluated in suitable cavities in 24 patients (12 male, 12 female). Ethical permission and consent were obtained.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Baseline data was collected on 44 restorations (25 Class III, 3 Class IV, 16 Class V) and reviewed independently by two of the three clinicians who contributed to the study who then reached a consensus score. Restorations were reviewed and scored in the same way at 3 months and 1, 2, 3 and 8 years.

RESULTS

The total number of alpha ratings at baseline and review (3 months and 1, 2, 3 and 8 years) appointments for the following parameters were: marginal adaptation (33, 28, 29, 27, 12, 17), anatomic form (39, 30, 32, 26, 17, 15), surface roughness (34, 26, 24, 23, 11, 4), colour match (24, 25, 26, 24, 15, 12) and marginal discolouration (39, 31, 30, 25, 10, 9). The incidence of secondary caries was very low. Life table analysis suggests a 73% survival, with no scores below B, at 8 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of these restorations continued to perform satisfactorily. Although this particular material is no longer available, these results may be applicable to currently available similar materials.

摘要

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of an anterior hybrid composite resin over 8 years.
Br Dent J. 1997 Jan 11;182(1):26-30. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809289.
2
In vivo comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid minifilled composite resin in Class III restorations: 2-year follow-up.
Clin Oral Investig. 1999 Jun;3(2):62-9. doi: 10.1007/s007840050080.
3
Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report.后牙复合树脂修复体的临床评估:十年报告
J Adhes Dent. 2001 Summer;3(2):185-94.
4
A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations.一项关于传统型和高流动性复合树脂用于Ⅱ类洞修复的半口随机临床试验。
J Dent. 2014 Jul;42(7):793-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
5
Evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin composites in Class I restorations: three-year results of a randomized, double-blind and controlled clinical trial.评价可压实型与传统混合型树脂复合材料在前牙Ⅰ类洞修复中的临床效果:一项随机、双盲、对照临床试验的 3 年结果。
Oper Dent. 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):11-9. doi: 10.2341/09-027CR.
6
Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.高 C 因素窝洞树脂复合材料修复体的耐用性:12 年随访。
J Dent. 2010 Jun;38(6):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
7
Clinical Performance and Epidemiologic Aspects of Fractured Anterior Teeth Restored with a Composite Resin: A Two-Year Clinical Study.临床性能和流行病学方面的前牙折断复合树脂修复:为期两年的临床研究。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e204-e209. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12645. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
8
A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.含表面预反应玻璃离子填料的聚硅氧烷修复系统的临床评估:13年随访检查结果
J Am Dent Assoc. 2014 Oct;145(10):1036-43. doi: 10.14219/jada.2014.57.
9
Direct composite restorations for the worn mandibular anterior dentition: a 7-year follow-up of a prospective randomised controlled split-mouth clinical trial.下颌前牙磨损的直接复合树脂修复:一项前瞻性随机对照分牙合临床研究的 7 年随访。
J Oral Rehabil. 2013 May;40(5):389-401. doi: 10.1111/joor.12042. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
10
Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.有和无咬合磨损小平面的非龋性颈部病变中树脂复合材料修复体的失败模式比较。
J Dent. 2014 Jul;42(7):824-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term survival and reasons for failure in direct anterior composite restorations: A systematic review.直接前牙复合树脂修复的长期生存率及失败原因:一项系统评价
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Sep-Oct;24(5):415-420. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_527_21. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
2
Color stability of siloranes versus methacrylate-based composites after immersion in staining solutions.硅烷醚类材料与甲基丙烯酸酯类复合材料在染色溶液浸泡后的颜色稳定性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Jul;17(6):1481-7. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0837-7. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
3
Fracture frequency and longevity of fractured resin composite, polyacid-modified resin composite, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement class IV restorations: an up to 14 years of follow-up.
四类修复体(树脂断裂频率和寿命、酸改性树脂复合材料、树脂改良型玻璃离子水门汀):长达 14 年的随访研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Apr;14(2):217-22. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0287-z. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
4
Anterior Z250 resin composite restorations: one-year evaluation of clinical performance.前牙Z250树脂复合材料修复体:临床性能的一年评估
Clin Oral Investig. 2003 Dec;7(4):241-3. doi: 10.1007/s00784-003-0231-6. Epub 2003 Sep 18.