Worth R M
Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1996 Dec;64(4):441-7.
Two different patterns of leprosy have occurred in Hawaii. First is the continuing influx of infected people among immigrants from several leprosy-endemic areas. The number of new cases among their descendents has tended to abate within one generation after arrival in Hawaii. The most recent example of this has occurred in Asians arriving since immigration laws were liberalized in 1965, followed by a rise of imported leprosy, peaking in 1970-1980, then falling. The second pattern was an explosive epidemic among native Hawaiians, rising to its peak in the 1890s, then slowly subsiding, and now approaching zero. It appears that official disease-control efforts (physical isolation and/or early multidrug treatment) cannot fully explain the ending of the epidemic in Hawaii, in spite of the continuing importation of M. leprae. It is suggested that the influence of changing socioeconomic factors (nutrition, crowding, genetics) has been of importance, particularly among the Hawaiians, who have undergone profound foreign influence (both positive and negative) during the 150-year history of this epidemic. The late Dr. Ma Haide was responsible for leprosy control in China, where leprosy is also fading away, but not simultaneously in all subpopulations. He summarized his view by saying, "Leprosy lingers longest among the poorest" (personal communication). This statement appears to hold true for Hawaii, also.
夏威夷出现了两种不同类型的麻风病情况。第一种是来自几个麻风病流行地区的移民中持续有感染者涌入。他们后代中的新病例数在抵达夏威夷后的一代人时间内往往会减少。最近的一个例子是自1965年移民法放宽以来抵达的亚洲人,随后输入性麻风病有所增加,在1970 - 1980年达到峰值,然后下降。第二种情况是夏威夷原住民中爆发的疫情,在19世纪90年代达到顶峰,随后逐渐消退,现在接近零。尽管麻风杆菌持续输入,但官方的疾病控制措施(身体隔离和/或早期联合药物治疗)似乎并不能完全解释夏威夷疫情的结束。有人认为,社会经济因素的变化(营养、拥挤程度、遗传因素)起到了重要作用,特别是在夏威夷人中,在这一长达150年疫情历史中,他们受到了深刻的外来影响(包括正面和负面)。已故的马海德医生曾负责中国的麻风病防治工作,在中国,麻风病也在逐渐消失,但并非在所有亚人群体中同时消失。他总结自己的观点时说:“麻风病在最贫困人群中持续的时间最长”(个人交流)。这句话在夏威夷似乎也成立。