Kind G M, Rademaker A W, Mustoe T A
Microsurgical Replantation Transplantation Department, Davies Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif., USA.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997 Feb;99(2):417-28. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199702000-00016.
Abdominal-wall function was evaluated preoperatively and at intervals postoperatively in 25 consecutive patients undergoing breast reconstruction with transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps (single-pedicled TRAM flap, 14 patients; free TRAM flap, 9 patients; and bilateral free TRAM flaps, 2 patients). Objective measures of abdominal-wall function were performed with the B200 Isostation, a triaxial dynamometer. In addition, the patients were assessed by a physical therapist and filled out an activity questionnaire at each postoperative examination. Tests of abdominal-wall function demonstrated the greatest decrease in performance at the 6-week postoperative tests of flexion. The maximum isometric flexion torque of the pedicled TRAM flap group decreased to 58 +/- 10 percent, while the unilateral free TRAM flap group average was 87 +/- 11 percent of baseline. For the pedicled TRAM flap group this difference was significant (p = 0.004). By the 6-month evaluation, the maximum isometric flexion torque increased for both the pedicled and the free TRAM flap groups to 89 +/- 13 percent and 93 +/- 8 percent of baseline, respectively. The physical therapist evaluation of abdominal-wall strength and the activity questionnaire data showed no statistically significant differences between groups or over time. Rectus abdominis muscle harvest for pedicled TRAM flaps causes a greater insult to the abdominal wall than does free TRAM flap harvest. The ultimate clinical effect of the sacrifice of even an entire rectus abdominis muscle appears to be well tolerated by most patients. This is the first prospective outcome study of abdominal-wall function in TRAM flap patients. The clinical implications of this information will be discussed.
对25例连续接受腹直肌横形肌皮瓣(TRAM瓣)乳房重建术的患者在术前及术后定期评估腹壁功能(单蒂TRAM瓣14例;游离TRAM瓣9例;双侧游离TRAM瓣2例)。采用B200等动测力仪对腹壁功能进行客观测量。此外,由物理治疗师对患者进行评估,且每位患者在术后每次检查时填写一份活动问卷。腹壁功能测试显示,术后6周的屈曲测试中表现下降最为明显。带蒂TRAM瓣组的最大等长屈曲扭矩降至基线值的58±10%,而单侧游离TRAM瓣组的平均值为基线值的87±11%。带蒂TRAM瓣组的这一差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.004)。到6个月评估时,带蒂和游离TRAM瓣组的最大等长屈曲扭矩分别增加至基线值的89±13%和93±8%。物理治疗师对腹壁强度的评估以及活动问卷数据显示,两组之间或随时间推移均无统计学上的显著差异。与游离TRAM瓣取材相比,带蒂TRAM瓣取材对腹壁造成的损伤更大。即使牺牲整条腹直肌,大多数患者似乎也能很好地耐受其最终的临床影响。这是关于TRAM瓣患者腹壁功能的第一项前瞻性结局研究。将讨论该信息的临床意义。