Pappadà G, Fiori L, Marina R, Vaiani S, Gaini S M
Neurosurgical Clinic University of Milan, Monza, Italy.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1996;138(12):1386-90. doi: 10.1007/BF01411116.
There are at present strong indications for surgery in patients suffering from symptomatic extracranial carotid stenoses of > 70%. Surgery of coincidental aneurysms is a still debated problem, but there is general agreement that it is indicated in selected cases according to the patient's life-expectancy and size and site of the aneurysm. The coexistence of these two lesions raises a decision-making problem. We reviewed 389 endarterectomies and found 12 intracranial berry aneurysms in 10 (2.6%) patients. All the 10 patients were harbouring a symptomatic carotid stenosis of > 70%. Since the correction of a stenosis increases blood flow to an aneurysm, our approach was to first operate on the intracranial lesion and then the stenosis in 7 patients harbouring aneurysms > 5 mm. Two patients affected by small aneurysms < 5 mm of an A2 azygos and left internal carotid artery underwent left endarterectomy only. The last patient was submitted first to percutaneous angioplasty of a left stenosis, then to open surgery of a contralateral middle cerebral aneurysm and finally to intravascular occlusion of a small aneurysm of the left internal carotid bifurcation by menas of a coil; this policy was adopted in order to restore normal haemodynamic conditions before the intracranial procedure. There was no mortality or permanent morbidity following surgery for aneurysm or endarterectomy. Transient morbidity occurred in 2 cases after clipping of aneurysms of the anterior communicating and middle cerebral arteries. Our results suggest that surgery of coincidental aneurysms may give good results even when there is a severe symptomatic stenosis in the neck. Moreover, the presence of a small intracranial aneurysm does not seem to be an additional risk factor for endarterectomy. When the lesions are on different sides, it may be better to treat the stenosis first if it decreases the ipsilateral cerebral blood flow.
目前,有强烈迹象表明,症状性颅外颈动脉狭窄超过70%的患者需要进行手术。同时存在动脉瘤时的手术仍是一个有争议的问题,但普遍认为,根据患者的预期寿命、动脉瘤的大小和位置,在某些特定情况下是需要手术的。这两种病变的并存引发了一个决策问题。我们回顾了389例动脉内膜切除术,发现10例(2.6%)患者中有12个颅内浆果状动脉瘤。所有这10例患者均有症状性颈动脉狭窄超过70%。由于纠正狭窄会增加流向动脉瘤的血流量,我们的方法是,对于7例动脉瘤直径大于5mm的患者,先对颅内病变进行手术,然后再处理狭窄。2例A2非对称和左颈内动脉小动脉瘤(直径小于5mm)患者仅接受了左动脉内膜切除术。最后1例患者先接受了左颈动脉狭窄的经皮血管成形术,然后接受了对侧大脑中动脉瘤的开放手术,最后通过弹簧圈对左颈内动脉分叉处的小动脉瘤进行血管内栓塞;采取这一策略是为了在进行颅内手术前恢复正常的血流动力学状况。动脉瘤手术或动脉内膜切除术后均无死亡或永久性并发症发生。前交通动脉和大脑中动脉动脉瘤夹闭术后有2例出现短暂性并发症。我们的结果表明,即使颈部存在严重的症状性狭窄,同时存在的动脉瘤手术也可能取得良好效果。此外,颅内小动脉瘤的存在似乎并不是动脉内膜切除术的额外危险因素。当病变位于不同侧时,如果狭窄会减少同侧脑血流量,可能最好先治疗狭窄。