Timonen K L, Randell J T, Salonen R O, Pekkanen J
Unit of Environmental Epidemiology, National Public Health Institute Kuopio, Finland.
Eur Respir J. 1997 Jan;10(1):82-7. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10010082.
The aim of this study was to compare immediate, daily and weekly variation in respiratory resistance measured by means of the forced oscillation technique (Rrs,FOT) to spirometric indices in 7-12 year old children with chronic respiratory symptoms. The lung function measurements were performed in 19 children on 4 days, i.e. two consecutive days during two consecutive weeks. On each day, the measurements were carried out at the same time of day and always repeated three times. In addition, Rrs,FOT and spirometric lung function indices were compared with an exercise challenge test in 12 children. Intrasubject coefficients of variation (CoVs) for Rrs,FOT were larger than those for spirometric indices. Only in the immediately repeated measurements was the CoV of maximal expiratory flow at 25% vital capacity larger than that of Rrs,FOT (16.6 vs 14.9%). At all time intervals, the smallest CoVs were observed in forced vital capacity (FVC) or in the ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second to FVC (2.0-2.6%). When excluding Rrs,FOT values which were not within 2 SD (0.11 kPa.L-1.s) of the differences between the immediately repeated measurements, the CoV of the immediately repeated measurements of Rrs,FOT was reduced to 9.1%, being smaller than that of maximal mid-expiratory flow (10.1%). However, even then the day-to-day variation in Rrs,FOT was clearly larger (16.0%) than those of the airflow indices at specified lung volumes (7.2-8.3%). This was also true for the weekly variation. In the exercise challenge test, there were larger changes in Rrs,FOT values than in the spirometric indices, but Rrs,FOT was the most sensitive index to detect changes in the respiratory system. In conclusion, the variation in Rrs,FOT values was larger than that of most spirometric indices. When a reliability index was applied, the immediate variation in Rrs,FOT values was comparable to those of the airflow indices at specified lung volumes. Rrs,FOT was also the most sensitive index in the exercise challenge test, and therefore it seems to be suitable for detection of short-term functional changes in the respiratory system. However, the relatively low repeatability of Rrs,FOT over days and weeks may limit its applicability to longer-term follow-ups.
本研究的目的是比较7至12岁有慢性呼吸道症状儿童通过强迫振荡技术(Rrs,FOT)测量的呼吸阻力的即时、每日和每周变化与肺量计指标。对19名儿童在4天内进行肺功能测量,即连续两周内的连续两天。每天在同一时间进行测量,且总是重复三次。此外,对12名儿童进行运动激发试验,比较Rrs,FOT和肺量计肺功能指标。Rrs,FOT的受试者内变异系数(CoV)大于肺量计指标的变异系数。仅在即时重复测量中,25%肺活量时的最大呼气流量的CoV大于Rrs,FOT的CoV(16.6%对14.9%)。在所有时间间隔内,用力肺活量(FVC)或一秒用力呼气容积与FVC之比的CoV最小(2.0 - 2.6%)。排除不在即时重复测量差异的2个标准差(0.11 kPa.L-1.s)范围内的Rrs,FOT值后,Rrs,FOT即时重复测量的CoV降至9.1%,小于最大呼气中期流量的CoV(10.1%)。然而,即便如此,Rrs,FOT的每日变化(16.0%)仍明显大于特定肺容积时气流指标的变化(7.2 - 8.3%)。每周变化情况也是如此。在运动激发试验中,Rrs,FOT值的变化大于肺量计指标的变化,但Rrs,FOT是检测呼吸系统变化最敏感的指标。总之,Rrs,FOT值的变化大于大多数肺量计指标的变化。应用可靠性指标时,Rrs,FOT值的即时变化与特定肺容积时气流指标的变化相当。Rrs,FOT在运动激发试验中也是最敏感的指标,因此它似乎适用于检测呼吸系统的短期功能变化。然而,Rrs,FOT在数天和数周内相对较低的可重复性可能会限制其在长期随访中的适用性。