Suppr超能文献

两种给药方案和两种药物制剂下米氮平的药代动力学

Mirtazapine pharmacokinetics with two dosage regimens and two pharmaceutical formulations.

作者信息

Timmer C J, Paanakker J E, Vrijmoed-de Vries M

机构信息

Department of Drug Metabolism & Kinetics, N.V. Organon, Oss, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Pharm Res. 1997 Jan;14(1):98-102. doi: 10.1023/a:1012067703764.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare, in a clinical study of a special design, the pharmacokinetic profile of mirtazapine in 20 young healthy male volunteers on two treatment regimens with homothetic oral tablets at steady state: NOCTE (1 x 30 mg at 21.00 h) and BID (15 mg at 21.00 h and 15 mg at 09.00 h).

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from mirtazapine plasma levels assayed by gas chromatography with nitrogen-sensitive detection. A special analysis of variance allowed interesting interactions to be distinguished.

RESULTS

The steady state was reached after 4 and 6 days for NOCTE and BID respectively; the difference was presumably due to intersubject variability. In accordance with pharmacokinetic theory, the peak-to-trough ratio at steady state was significantly lower (twofold) for BID than for NOCTE. Within BID, a small difference (approx. 10%) was found in the extent of absorption between evening and morning administration. Although statistically significant, this difference meets strict bioequivalence requirements. The regimens NOCTE and BID were found to be bioequivalent for the steady-state area-under-the-curve-curve and the peak time. Bioequivalence testing for the peak level was not meaningful due to the difference in dosing regimens. The observed elimination half-lives of 19.7 +/- 3.0 h and 20.8 +/- 2.7 h (n = 20) for NOCTE and BID, respectively are in agreement with previous results.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences (if any) were found to meet strict bioequivalence requirements and were so small that they are of no clinical consequences.

摘要

目的

在一项特殊设计的临床研究中,比较20名年轻健康男性志愿者在两种稳态下口服等比例片剂的治疗方案中米氮平的药代动力学特征:夜间单次给药(21:00时服用1片30毫克)和每日两次给药(21:00时服用15毫克,09:00时服用15毫克)。

方法

通过气相色谱氮敏检测法测定米氮平血浆浓度来计算药代动力学参数。采用特殊的方差分析来区分有意义的相互作用。

结果

夜间单次给药和每日两次给药分别在4天和6天后达到稳态;差异可能是由于个体间变异性所致。根据药代动力学理论,每日两次给药在稳态时的峰谷比显著低于夜间单次给药(两倍)。在每日两次给药方案中,傍晚和早晨给药的吸收程度存在微小差异(约10%)。尽管具有统计学意义,但这种差异符合严格的生物等效性要求。发现夜间单次给药和每日两次给药方案在稳态曲线下面积和达峰时间方面具有生物等效性。由于给药方案不同,峰浓度的生物等效性测试无意义。夜间单次给药和每日两次给药观察到的消除半衰期分别为19.7±3.0小时和20.8±2.7小时(n = 20),与先前结果一致。

结论

发现的差异(如果有的话)符合严格的生物等效性要求,且差异很小,无临床意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验