Turbott J
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1996 Dec;30(6):720-7; discussion 728-30. doi: 10.3109/00048679609065037.
Recent psychiatric literature and contemporary sociopolitical developments suggest a need to reconsider the place of religion and spirituality in psychiatry. This paper was written with the aim of encouraging dialogue between the often antithetical realms of religion and science.
Material from psychiatric, sociological and religious studies literature was reviewed, with particular emphasis on New Zealand sources.
Despite the secularising effects of science, the presence and influence of 'religiosity' remains substantial in Western culture. The literature emphasises the central importance of religion and spirituality for mental health, and the difficulty of integrating these concepts with scientific medicine. Psychiatric tradition and training may exaggerate the 'religiosity gap between doctors and patients. In New Zealand, the politically mandated bicultural approach to mental health demands an understanding of Maori spirituality.
Intellectual, moral and pragmatic arguments all suggest that psychiatry should reconsider its attitude to religion and spirituality. There are many opportunities for research in the field. Psychiatry would benefit if the vocabulary and concepts of religion and spirituality were more familiar to trainees and practitioners. Patients would find better understanding from psychiatrists, and fruitful interdisciplinary dialogue about mutual issues of 'ultimate concern' might ensue.
近期的精神病学文献以及当代社会政治发展表明,有必要重新审视宗教与精神性在精神病学中的地位。本文旨在鼓励宗教与科学这两个通常相互对立的领域之间展开对话。
回顾了来自精神病学、社会学和宗教研究文献的资料,特别强调了新西兰的资料来源。
尽管科学具有世俗化的影响,但“宗教性”在西方文化中的存在和影响仍然很大。文献强调宗教与精神性对心理健康的核心重要性,以及将这些概念与科学医学相结合的困难。精神病学传统和培训可能会夸大医生与患者之间的“宗教性差距”。在新西兰,政治上规定的心理健康双文化方法要求理解毛利人的精神性。
智力、道德和务实的论据均表明,精神病学应重新审视其对宗教与精神性的态度。该领域有许多研究机会。如果实习生和从业者对宗教与精神性的词汇和概念更加熟悉,精神病学将从中受益。患者会从精神科医生那里得到更好的理解,并且可能会就“终极关切”的共同问题展开富有成效的跨学科对话。