Computed radiography in musculoskeletal imaging.

In conclusion, CR offers many advantages in comparison with conventional radiography. Musculoskeletal radiology particularly benefits from the wide dynamic range and image-processing capabilities of CR. Most studies have not shown a statistically significant difference in observer performance (diagnostic accuracy) of CR in comparison with conventional radiography in musculoskeletal applications. In addition, dose reduction in the range of 25% to 50% is possible with many musculoskeletal images. However, disadvantages are also apparent and include reduced spatial resolution, increased noise, and change in image size and format. Overall, the advantages of CR and digital technology outweigh its limitations and for these reasons continue to promote the conversion from conventional radiography.