Martin P
Encephale. 1996 Sep-Oct;22(5):321-30.
Budgetary control policies implemented in order to cope with the increase in health costs in industrialized countries and with the desequilibrium of the national health insurance accounts, give rise to the problem of preserving the quality of care and quality of life of the patients. Only health economic studies, evaluating the possible different therapeutic strategies, will enable us to reconcile the 2 terms of the equation whose contradiction might be only apparent. This is particularly true for the treatment of psychiatric diseases, and especially depression. Budgetary control cannot be reduced to a simple management of penury, since the cheapest treatments are not necessarily the most profitable. In this context, new strategies are proposed: it is suggested that thorough diagnosis (avoiding both the non acknowledgement of the illness and the overconsumption of antidepressants) and early optimal treatment, of adequate duration, of the depressive disorders might be the most economic attitude in the management of this pathology. On the other hand, the impact of the treatment of depression on the quality of life of the patient has a direct effect on costs if one considers the supplement to medical consumption and the social deficit induced by therapeutic failure. It remains that the evaluation of the health economics of depression is difficult because of the complexity of the parameters involved. Though rather well developed in the UK and in North America, this evaluation still has to be introduced in France.
为应对工业化国家医疗成本的增加以及国民健康保险账户的失衡而实施的预算控制政策,引发了如何维护患者护理质量和生活质量的问题。只有通过卫生经济学研究,评估可能的不同治疗策略,才能使我们协调这个等式的两个方面,而这两者之间的矛盾可能只是表面上的。这在精神疾病尤其是抑郁症的治疗中尤为如此。预算控制不能简化为单纯的节约管理,因为最便宜的治疗方法不一定是最划算的。在此背景下,提出了新的策略:建议对抑郁症进行全面诊断(避免既不承认疾病又过度使用抗抑郁药)并尽早进行持续时间适当的最佳治疗,这可能是管理这种病症最经济的方式。另一方面,如果考虑到因治疗失败导致的医疗消费增加和社会赤字,抑郁症治疗对患者生活质量的影响会直接影响成本。由于所涉及参数的复杂性,抑郁症的卫生经济学评估仍然困难。尽管在英国和北美发展得相当完善,但这种评估在法国仍有待引入。