Green D W
Department of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London.
Anaesthesia. 1996 Dec;51(12):1129-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb15049.x.
A clinical and statistical comparison of systolic, mean and diastolic arterial blood pressures was made between a non-invasive technique using a neonatal oscillometric blood pressure monitor attached to the thumb versus an invasive technique using a catheter inserted into the ipsilateral radial artery in 18 patients undergoing general anaesthesia for major surgery. In 1258 readings, the mean differences between the pressures obtained (invasive versus non-invasive) were +9.1, -7.9, and -0.7 mmHg for systolic, diastolic and mean pressures respectively. Oscillometric blood pressure measurement using the thumb appears to be an acceptable method for monitoring blood pressure during anaesthesia and has advantages over conventional cuff placement on the upper arm.
对18例接受大手术全身麻醉的患者，使用连接在拇指上的新生儿示波血压监测仪的非侵入性技术与通过插入同侧桡动脉的导管的侵入性技术，进行了收缩压、平均动脉压和舒张压的临床及统计学比较。在1258次读数中，所测压力（侵入性与非侵入性）的平均差值分别为：收缩压+9.1 mmHg、舒张压-7.9 mmHg、平均动脉压-0.7 mmHg。使用拇指进行示波血压测量似乎是麻醉期间监测血压的一种可接受的方法，并且比在上臂放置传统袖带更具优势。
