Suppr超能文献

全麻患者连续无创指动脉压监测与常规间断自动臂动脉压测量的比较。

Comparison of continuous non-invasive finger arterial pressure monitoring with conventional intermittent automated arm arterial pressure measurement in patients under general anaesthesia.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, PO Box 30 001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, PO Box 30 001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;113(1):67-74. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu091. Epub 2014 Apr 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For a majority of patients undergoing anaesthesia for general surgery, mean arterial pressure (MAP) is only measured intermittently by arm cuff oscillometry (MAPiNIAP). In contrast, the Nexfin(®) device provides continuous non-invasive measurement of MAP (MAPcNIAP) using a finger cuff. We explored the agreement of MAPcNIAP and MAPiNIAP with the gold standard: continuous invasive MAP measurement by placement of a radial artery catheter (MAPinvasive).

METHODS

In a total of 120 patients undergoing elective general surgery and clinically requiring MAPinvasive measurement, MAPiNIAP and MAPcNIAP were measured in a 30 min time period at an arbitrary moment during surgery with stable haemodynamics. MAPiNIAP was measured every 5 min.

RESULTS

Data from 112 patients were analysed. Compared with MAPinvasive, modified Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias (sd) of 2 (9) mm Hg for MAPcNIAP and -2 (12) mm Hg for MAPiNIAP. Percentage errors for MAPcNIAP and MAPiNIAP were 22% and 32%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In a haemodynamically stable phase in patients undergoing general anaesthesia, the agreement with invasive MAP of continuous non-invasive measurement using a finger cuff was not inferior to the agreement of intermittent arm cuff oscillometry. Continuous measurements using a finger cuff can interchangeably be used as an alternative for intermittent arm cuff oscillometry in haemodynamically stable patients, with the advantage of beat-to-beat haemodynamic monitoring.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT 01362335 (clinicaltrials.gov).

摘要

背景

对于大多数接受全身麻醉的患者,平均动脉压(MAP)仅通过手臂袖带振荡法(MAPiNIAP)间歇性测量。相比之下,Nexfin(®)设备使用手指袖带提供连续无创的 MAP 测量(MAPcNIAP)。我们探讨了 MAPcNIAP 和 MAPiNIAP 与金标准(通过放置桡动脉导管进行连续有创 MAP 测量)的一致性。

方法

在总共 120 名接受择期全身手术且临床需要 MAPinvasive 测量的患者中,在手术期间血流动力学稳定的任意时刻,在 30 分钟的时间内测量 MAPiNIAP 和 MAPcNIAP。MAPiNIAP 每 5 分钟测量一次。

结果

分析了 112 名患者的数据。与 MAPinvasive 相比,改良 Bland-Altman 分析显示 MAPcNIAP 的偏差(标准差)为 2(9)mmHg,MAPiNIAP 的偏差为-2(12)mmHg。MAPcNIAP 和 MAPiNIAP 的百分比误差分别为 22%和 32%。

结论

在全身麻醉患者血流动力学稳定的阶段,使用手指袖带进行连续无创测量与有创 MAP 的一致性不亚于间歇性手臂袖带振荡法的一致性。在血流动力学稳定的患者中,连续使用手指袖带测量可以替代间歇性手臂袖带振荡法,具有逐搏血流动力学监测的优势。

临床试验注册

NCT 01362335(clinicaltrials.gov)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验