Regional differences in gastric acidity and antacid distribution: is a single pH electrode sufficient?

UNLABELLED

Accurate measurement of intragastric acidity has both clinical and investigational importance in studying gastric pathophysiology.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were fourfold: (1) to investigate whether regional differences in intragastric acidity exist; (2) to determine intragastric acidity after a standard antacid was administered in both the fasting and fed states; (3) to monitor gastric emptying of and anatomic distribution of radiolabeled antacid during fasting and postprandial periods; and (4) to determine whether the regional effects of ingested antacid correlated with the anatomic distribution of the antacid.

METHODS

Eight normal male volunteers were studied after fluoroscopically guided nasogastric placement of a tube assembly containing four pH electrodes, with one electrode in each quartile of the stomach. Simultaneous pH readings were made from the four electrodes while fasting, after administration of fasting antacid (30 ml, 79 mEq buffering capacity), postprandially, and after postprandial antacid ingestion. All subjects repeated the protocol on a separate day, five of them using radiolabeled antacid. Gastric emptying and gastric distribution over time of radiolabeled antacid were determined for comparison to regional intragastric acidity.

RESULTS

Intragastric acidity varied regionally over time in response to meals and to fasting and postprandial antacid. In the fasting state, intragastric acidity returned to baseline after antacid ingestion in a proximal to distal (cardia to antrum) sequence, while postprandial antacid resulted in a return to baseline acidity in a distal to proximal (antrum to cardia) sequence. Radiolabeled antacid distribution paralleled intragastric pH and hydrogen ion concentration in the fasting state, with 82% of the antacid localizing in the distal half of the stomach within the first minute after antacid ingestion. Postprandially, the greatest initial and most prolonged antacid buffering effect occurred proximally, correlating with the presence of radiolabeled antacid. Postprandial antacid remained in the stomach for a longer time (T1/2 = 93.1 +/- 23.4 min) compared with fasting antacid (T1/2 = 23.6 +/- 11.1 min).

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of acidity in the four quartiles of the stomach demonstrated regional variation in response to both food and a standard antacid. A single pH electrode does not detect regional intragastric pH differences.