Anderson D G, Vojir C, Johnson M
Mountain-Plains, Regional AIDS Education and Training Center, Denver, CO 80222, USA.
Acad Med. 1997 Feb;72(2):144-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199702000-00023.
To assess the relative importance of factors influentail by the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS), such as didactic and clinical training, and the number of HIV-infected individuals known personally, on students' HIV-related knowledge and attitudes.
A survey was undertaken of the classes of 1991 and 1994 at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, the University of New Mexico School of Medicine, and the University of South Dakota School of Medicine. The questionnaire contained 40 knowledge questions, 20 attitude questions, and demographic questions. The students reported estimates of HIV-related didactic hours and clinical encounters experienced during their training, as well as the number of HIV-infected individuals known personally. Data analysis employed two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson correlation coefficients.
In 1991 the response rates were 73% from Colorado, 54% from New Mexico, and 50% from South Dakota; in 1994 the rates were 80%, 63%, and 60%, respectively. Training programs were similar between schools and over time, varying only in the amounts of didactic information offered. The 1994 students scored significantly better than did 1991 students on knowledge, overall attitude, fear of infection, and willingness to treat HIV-infected patients; these variables were significantly correlated with the numbers of HIV-infected individuals known personally by the students. Didactic training hours were not significantly correlated with any study variable, and clinical experiences were correlated only with increased knowledge.
Differences in HIV/AIDS prevalences did not affect the schools' training programs, but indirectly affected the students' knowledge and attitudes, which were related to the numbers of HIV-infected individuals known personally by the students. The authors recommend that medical schools increase students' opportunities for meaningful personal contact with HIV-infected individuals.
评估诸如理论与临床培训以及个人认识的艾滋病毒感染者数量等受人类免疫缺陷病毒/获得性免疫缺陷综合征(HIV/AIDS)流行情况影响的因素,对学生与HIV相关的知识和态度的相对重要性。
对科罗拉多大学医学院、新墨西哥大学医学院和南达科他大学医学院1991级和1994级的班级进行了一项调查。问卷包含40个知识问题、20个态度问题和人口统计学问题。学生们报告了他们在培训期间估计的与HIV相关的理论学时和临床接触次数,以及个人认识的HIV感染者数量。数据分析采用双向方差分析(ANOVA)和皮尔逊相关系数。
1991年,科罗拉多的回应率为73%,新墨西哥为54%,南达科他为50%;1994年,回应率分别为80%、63%和60%。不同学校以及不同时间的培训项目相似,只是提供的理论信息数量有所不同。1994年的学生在知识、总体态度、对感染的恐惧以及治疗HIV感染者的意愿方面得分显著高于1991年的学生;这些变量与学生个人认识的HIV感染者数量显著相关。理论培训学时与任何研究变量均无显著相关性,而临床经验仅与知识的增加相关。
HIV/AIDS流行情况的差异并未影响学校的培训项目,但间接影响了学生的知识和态度,而这些与学生个人认识的HIV感染者数量有关。作者建议医学院增加学生与HIV感染者进行有意义的个人接触的机会。