Elliott C
Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997 Feb;54(2):113-6. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830140021003.
Depressed patients are often asked to take part in clinical research studies that carry risk. These patients are generally assumed to be mentally competent to consent to research, since depression often leaves a patient's cognitive abilities intact. In this article, it is argued that many severely depressed patients may not be competent to consent because they cannot be considered accountable for their decisions. The article presents 2 arguments: first, that it is unclear whether the decisions of some severely depressed patients are authentically theirs, and second, that some severely depressed patients may not have the appropriate minimal degree of concern for their own well-being. It is argued that assessments of competence must take account of emotional factors, and that, if severely depressed patients are incompetent to consent, research studies involving a poor risk-benefit ratio will be much more difficult to justify.
抑郁症患者常常被要求参与存在风险的临床研究。这些患者通常被认为在精神上有能力同意参与研究,因为抑郁症往往不会损害患者的认知能力。本文认为,许多重度抑郁症患者可能没有能力同意参与研究,因为他们无法对自己的决定负责。文章提出了两个论点:第一,一些重度抑郁症患者的决定是否真正属于他们自己并不明确;第二,一些重度抑郁症患者可能对自身福祉缺乏适当的最低程度的关注。本文认为,能力评估必须考虑情感因素,并且,如果重度抑郁症患者没有能力同意参与研究,那么涉及低风险效益比的研究将更难自圆其说。