Zackon D H, Casson E J, Stelmach L, Faubert J, Racette L
University of Ottawa Eye Institute, Canada.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997 Feb;38(2):364-71.
The purpose of the study was to investigate the role of subcortical processing in human visual attention. The midbrain contribution to visual attention is unclear. Although evidence exists for a subcortical attentional advantage in ocular motor tasks, such an advantage has not been shown in perceptual tasks. Because retinotectal projections arise predominantly from nasal retina (i.e., temporal hemifield), subcortical attention should be distributed asymmetrically for monocular viewing conditions with an advantage to the temporal hemifield.
To test for a subcortical attentional effect, the authors compared the results of binocular and monocular viewing conditions using the split priming motion induction paradigm. In this perceptual attention paradigm, priming cues are presented to the left and right of fixation followed by an instantaneously presented horizontal bar. As a result of attention to the priming cues, motion is perceived within the bar as it appears to draw in from the two lateral cues toward a central collision point. Asymmetrically distributed attention results in an asymmetry in the perception of motion within the bar, and thus the perceived collision point will be shifted away from the center.
In two separate studies, one with and one without control of eye movements, the authors found significant differences between the results for monocular and binocular presentation. When the stimulus configuration is presented to the left eye, the perceived collision point is shifted toward the center consistent with a subcortical attentional effect. However, presentation of the stimulus configuration to the right eye yields the same results as those of binocular presentation.
This pattern of results can be explained by a separate and additive interaction between cortical and subcortical attentional effects in the visual field. Dominance of the left visual field for cortical attention and dominance of the temporal visual field for subcortical attention act together when the initial priming cue occurs in the temporal (left) visual field of the left eye. However, these influences compete when the same stimulus configuration is presented to the right eye, where cortical attention predominates in the left visual field and subcortical attention predominates in the temporal (right) visual field.
本研究旨在探讨皮层下加工在人类视觉注意中的作用。中脑对视觉注意的贡献尚不清楚。虽然有证据表明在眼球运动任务中存在皮层下注意优势,但在知觉任务中尚未显示出这种优势。由于视网膜顶盖投射主要来自鼻侧视网膜(即颞侧半视野),在单眼观察条件下,皮层下注意应呈不对称分布,颞侧半视野具有优势。
为了测试皮层下注意效应,作者使用分离启动运动诱导范式比较了双眼和单眼观察条件下的结果。在这个知觉注意范式中,启动线索呈现在注视点的左侧和右侧,随后立即呈现一个水平条。由于对启动线索的注意,当水平条似乎从两个外侧线索向中心碰撞点拉近时,会在条内感知到运动。注意的不对称分布会导致条内运动感知的不对称,因此感知到的碰撞点会从中心偏移。
在两项独立研究中,一项有眼动控制,一项无眼动控制,作者发现单眼和双眼呈现结果之间存在显著差异。当刺激配置呈现给左眼时,感知到的碰撞点向中心偏移,这与皮层下注意效应一致。然而,将刺激配置呈现给右眼时,产生的结果与双眼呈现相同。
这种结果模式可以通过视野中皮层和皮层下注意效应之间的单独相加相互作用来解释。当初始启动线索出现在左眼的颞侧(左侧)视野时,左视野对皮层注意的优势和颞侧视野对皮层下注意的优势共同起作用。然而,当相同的刺激配置呈现给右眼时,这些影响相互竞争,此时左视野中皮层注意占主导,颞侧(右侧)视野中皮层下注意占主导。