Abulhosn R S, Morray B H, Llewellyn C E, Redding G J
Sharp Grossmont Family Medical Center, La Mesa, Calif, USA.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997 Feb;151(2):135-9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1997.02170390025005.
To determine if children with chronic asthma hospitalized for an acute exacerbation experienced prolonged clinical recovery after hospital discharge if they returned to a home environment in which they were exposed to environmental tobacco smoke.
A prospective longitudinal study.
Children's Hospital and Medical Center, Seattle, Wash.
Patients admitted to the emergency department of the Children's Hospital and Medical Center with the single diagnosis of asthma (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] code 493).
Twenty-two children with acute asthma were sequentially enrolled in the study and longitudinally observed between February and -June 1994. The tobacco-smoking group (n = 11) was defined as having at least 1 smoker in the home. The nonsmoking group (n = 11) had no environmental tobacco smoke exposure at home. The 2 groups were similar in age, sex, preadmission chronic asthma severity, and immediate predischarge asthma status. Discharge medication use was similar in the 2 groups During a 1 month follow-up period, the tobacco-smoking group had a significantly greater number of symptomatic days than the nonsmoking group (P < .05) Of the children in the nonsmoking group, 9 (82%) had less than 1 symptomatic day per week compared with 3 (27%) in the tobacco-smoking group. beta 2-Agonist bronchodilator use declined significantly (P < .001) during follow-up in the nonsmoking group but not in the tobacco-smoking group, despite similar anti-inflammatory drug therapy in both groups.
Recovery by children after hospitalization for acute asthma is impaired by environmental tobacco smoke exposure when the period of recovery is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and use of asthma medication for symptomatic relief. These findings underscore the need to limit environmental tobacco smoke exposure in children with asthma and argue for closer physician follow-up of those children returning to a home environment in which smokers are present.
确定因急性加重而住院的慢性哮喘儿童出院后若回到有环境烟草烟雾暴露的家庭环境中,其临床恢复时间是否会延长。
一项前瞻性纵向研究。
华盛顿州西雅图市儿童医院及医疗中心。
儿童医院及医疗中心急诊科收治的仅诊断为哮喘(国际疾病分类第九版[ICD - 9]编码493)的患者。
1994年2月至6月期间,22例急性哮喘儿童相继纳入研究并进行纵向观察。吸烟组(n = 11)定义为家中至少有1名吸烟者。非吸烟组(n = 11)家中无环境烟草烟雾暴露。两组在年龄、性别、入院前慢性哮喘严重程度及出院前即刻哮喘状态方面相似。两组出院时用药情况相似。在1个月的随访期内,吸烟组的症状天数显著多于非吸烟组(P <.05)。非吸烟组中,9例(82%)每周症状天数少于1天,而吸烟组为3例(27%)。尽管两组抗炎药物治疗相似,但随访期间非吸烟组β2 - 激动剂支气管扩张剂的使用显著减少(P <.001),而吸烟组未减少。
当恢复期间以持续呼吸道症状和使用哮喘药物缓解症状为特征时,环境烟草烟雾暴露会损害急性哮喘儿童住院后的恢复。这些发现强调了限制哮喘儿童环境烟草烟雾暴露的必要性,并主张对回到有吸烟者家庭环境中的儿童进行更密切的医生随访。