Skog S, Lewensohn R, He Q, Borg A L, Gatti R
Department of Medical Radiobiology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Cancer Detect Prev. 1997;21(1):91-102.
Cell cycle transition defects of homozygous ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) cells were studied by using a cell cycle flow calculation method, which evaluates the dynamics of cell cycle traverse. We compared five human lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) from A-T homozygotes belonging to complementation group A (ARO, BRO, RJO) and group C (CSA, BMA) with three cell lines from healthy volunteers (KK-B2, MTB, HGL). The A-T cell lines ARO and BRO were derived from the same family. Cell growth and cell cycle traverse were followed for 72 h after X-irradiation with 1-6 Gy. LCLs from healthy volunteers immediately arrested in G1 in a dose-dependent pattern, while the A-T cells did not arrest in G1 until after 12 to 24 h. The time for the appearance of the G1 arrest of these cells was independent of complementation group. The delayed G1 arrest seen in the A-T cells paralleled a lack of induction of p53, as described by others. In respect to G2 arrest, A-T cells from complementation group C (CSA, BMA) arrested to the same extent as cells from healthy volunteers. On the other hand, the other LCLs from complementation group A arrested normally, while cells from ARO and BRO did not arrest in G2. The lack of G2 arrest in BRO cells was accompanied by unchanged cdc2p34 activity. In summary, a defective radiation-induced G1 arrest seems to be present in both complementation groups of A-T homozygotes, whereas a defective G2 arrest in not always observed. The defective G1 arrest seen in A-T cells may play an important role in tumor cell survival after exposure to therapeutic irradiation.
采用细胞周期流动计算方法研究了纯合共济失调毛细血管扩张症(A-T)细胞的细胞周期转换缺陷,该方法可评估细胞周期进程的动态变化。我们将来自互补组A(ARO、BRO、RJO)和组C(CSA、BMA)的A-T纯合子的五个人类淋巴母细胞系(LCL)与来自健康志愿者的三个细胞系(KK-B2、MTB、HGL)进行了比较。A-T细胞系ARO和BRO来自同一家族。用1-6 Gy的X射线照射后,跟踪细胞生长和细胞周期进程72小时。来自健康志愿者的LCL立即以剂量依赖性模式停滞在G1期,而A-T细胞直到12至24小时后才停滞在G1期。这些细胞出现G1期停滞的时间与互补组无关。如其他人所述,A-T细胞中延迟的G1期停滞与p53诱导缺乏平行。关于G2期停滞,互补组C的A-T细胞(CSA、BMA)与来自健康志愿者的细胞停滞程度相同。另一方面,互补组A的其他LCL正常停滞,而ARO和BRO的细胞在G2期没有停滞。BRO细胞缺乏G2期停滞伴随着cdc2p34活性不变。总之,A-T纯合子的两个互补组似乎都存在辐射诱导的G1期停滞缺陷,而G2期停滞缺陷并非总是观察到。A-T细胞中观察到的G1期停滞缺陷可能在肿瘤细胞接受治疗性照射后的存活中起重要作用。