Zwart J A
Department of Neurology, Regionsykehuset i Trondheim, Norway.
Headache. 1997 Jan;37(1):6-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1997.3701006.x.
The main purpose of this study was to assess neck mobility (by Cybex equipment) in different headache disorders and, in particular, cervicogenic headache, and to compare these findings with those in controls. A total of 51 control subjects and 90 headache patients were investigated, where of 28 patients suffered from common migraine (migraine without aura), 34 from tension-type headache (9 episodic and 25 chronic), and 28 patients from cervicogenic headache. One-way ANOVA and post hoc Bonferroni analysis showed significant differences between those with cervicogenic headache and the other groups for rotation (P < 0.001) and flexion/extension (P < 0.001), but not for lateral neck movement (P = NS). There were no significant differences between migraine patients, tension-type headache patients, and controls. In all four groups, there was a significant positive correlation between active and passive neck movement for rotation (P < 0.001), flexion/extension (P < 0.001), and lateral neck movement (P < 0.001). Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed no significant day-to-day differences in 10 control subjects. In the control group (n = 51), there was a significant negative correlation between age and neck movement. For rotation, Pearson's correlation coefficient was; r = -0.71 (P < 0.001), for flexion/extension r = -0.71 (P < 0.001), and for lateral neck movement r = -0.67 (P < 0.001). No significant sex difference was found as for any of the neck movements. Pain at the time of investigation did not seem to influence neck mobility. Cervicogenic headache has been recognized as a pain syndrome by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). Since reduced neck mobility is one of the major criteria for this diagnosis, it emphasizes the need for systematic, objective neck mobility measurements in the individual patient to substantiate the diagnosis. The technique is simple and proved reliable.
本研究的主要目的是评估不同头痛疾病,尤其是颈源性头痛患者的颈部活动度(通过Cybex设备),并将这些结果与对照组进行比较。共对51名对照受试者和90名头痛患者进行了调查,其中28例为普通偏头痛(无先兆偏头痛),34例为紧张型头痛(9例发作性和25例慢性),28例为颈源性头痛。单因素方差分析和事后Bonferroni分析显示,颈源性头痛患者与其他组在旋转(P < 0.001)和屈伸(P < 0.001)方面存在显著差异,但在颈部侧屈运动方面无显著差异(P =无统计学意义)。偏头痛患者、紧张型头痛患者和对照组之间无显著差异。在所有四组中,主动和被动颈部旋转运动(P < 0.001)、屈伸运动(P < 0.001)和颈部侧屈运动(P < 0.001)之间均存在显著正相关。重复测量方差分析显示,10名对照受试者的日常差异无统计学意义。在对照组(n = 51)中,年龄与颈部活动度之间存在显著负相关。旋转时,Pearson相关系数为r = -0.71(P < 0.001),屈伸时r = -0.71(P < 0.001),颈部侧屈运动时r = -0.67(P < 0.001)。未发现任何颈部运动存在显著性别差异。调查时的疼痛似乎不影响颈部活动度。颈源性头痛已被国际疼痛研究协会(IASP)确认为一种疼痛综合征。由于颈部活动度降低是该诊断的主要标准之一,因此强调需要对个体患者进行系统、客观的颈部活动度测量,以证实诊断。该技术简单且可靠。