Schwartzkopf S H
Lockheed Missiles and Space Corporation, Inc., Palo Alto, California, USA.
Adv Space Biol Med. 1997;6:231-53. doi: 10.1016/s1569-2574(08)60085-4.
The requirements for a human life support system for long-duration space missions are reviewed. The system design of a controlled ecological life support system is briefly described, followed by a more detailed account of the study of the conceptual design of a Lunar Based CELSS. The latter is to provide a safe, reliable, recycling lunar base life support system based on a hybrid physicochemical/biological representative technology. The most important conclusion reached by this study is that implementation of a completely recycling CELSS approach for a lunar base is not only feasible, but eminently practical. On a cumulative launch mass basis, a 4-person Lunar Base CELSS would pay for itself in approximately 2.6 years relative to a physicochemical air/water recycling system with resupply of food from the Earth. For crew sizes of 30 and 100, the breakeven point would come even sooner, after 2.1 and 1.7 years, respectively, due to the increased mass savings that can be realized with the larger plant growth units. Two other conclusions are particularly important with regard to the orientation of future research and technology development. First, the mass estimates of the Lunar Base CELSS indicate that a primary design objective in implementing this kind of system must be to minimized the mass and power requirement of the food production plant growth units, which greatly surpass those of the other air and water recycling systems. Consequently, substantial research must be directed at identifying ways to produce food more efficiently. On the other hand, detailed studies to identify the best technology options for the other subsystems should not be expected to produce dramatic reductions in either mass or power requirement of a Lunar Base CELSS. The most crucial evaluation criterion must, therefore, be the capability for functional integration of these technologies into the ultimate design of the system. Secondly, this study illustrates that existing or near-term technologies are adequate to implement a Lunar Base CELSS. There are no apparent "show-stoppers" which require the development of new technologies. However, there are several areas in which new materials and technologies could be used for a more efficient implementation of the system, e.g., by decreasing mass or power requirement and increasing recycling efficiency. These areas must be further addressed through research and development. Finally, although this study focused on the development of a Lunar Base CELSS, the same technologies and a nearly identical design would be appropriate for a Mars base. Actually, except for the distance of transportation, the implementation of a CELSS on Mars would even be easier than it would be on the Moon. The presence of atmospheric CO2 on Mars, although in low concentration, coupled with the fact that the day/night cycle on Mars is very similar to that on Earth, makes the use of light-weight, greenhouse-like structures for growing food plants even more feasible than on the Moon. There are some environmental problems, which would have to be dealt with, like dust storms and the large amount of the ultraviolet radiation incident on the planet's surface. However, the materials and methods are largely available today to develop such a life support system for a Mars base.
本文综述了长期太空任务中人类生命支持系统的要求。简要描述了受控生态生命支持系统的系统设计,随后更详细地阐述了基于月球的受控生态生命支持系统概念设计的研究。后者旨在基于混合物理化学/生物代表性技术,提供一个安全、可靠、可循环利用的月球基地生命支持系统。该研究得出的最重要结论是,为月球基地实施完全可循环利用的受控生态生命支持系统方法不仅可行,而且非常实用。以累计发射质量计算,相对于从地球补给食物的物理化学空气/水循环系统,一个4人月球基地受控生态生命支持系统大约在2.六年内就能实现自给自足。对于30人和100人的乘员规模,由于更大的植物生长单元能实现更多的质量节省,盈亏平衡点分别在2.1年和1.7年后更早到来。关于未来研究和技术发展的方向,另外两个结论尤为重要。首先,月球基地受控生态生命支持系统的质量估计表明,实施这类系统的一个主要设计目标必须是尽量减少食物生产植物生长单元的质量和功率需求,其质量和功率需求大大超过其他空气和水循环系统。因此,必须进行大量研究以确定更高效生产食物的方法。另一方面,期望通过详细研究确定其他子系统的最佳技术选项,不会使月球基地受控生态生命支持系统在质量或功率需求上有显著降低。因此,最关键的评估标准必须是这些技术集成到系统最终设计中的功能能力。其次,本研究表明现有或近期技术足以实施月球基地受控生态生命支持系统。没有明显的“阻碍因素”需要开发新技术。然而,有几个领域可以使用新材料和技术来更高效地实施该系统,例如通过降低质量或功率需求以及提高循环利用效率。这些领域必须通过研发进一步解决。最后,尽管本研究专注于月球基地受控生态生命支持系统的开发,但相同的技术和几乎相同的设计也适用于火星基地。实际上,除了运输距离外,在火星上实施受控生态生命支持系统甚至比在月球上更容易。火星上存在大气二氧化碳,尽管浓度较低,再加上火星的昼夜循环与地球非常相似,这使得使用轻质、类似温室的结构种植食用植物比在月球上更可行。不过,有一些环境问题必须加以解决,比如沙尘暴和大量入射到行星表面的紫外线辐射。然而,如今在很大程度上已有材料和方法来开发这样一个火星基地生命支持系统。