Guydish J, Werdegar D, Tajima B, Price M, Acampora A
Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1997 Feb;23(1):99-114. doi: 10.3109/00952999709001690.
Clients who entered and remained in day treatment for at least 2 weeks (N = 66) were interviewed at 6, 12, and 18 months after baseline. Follow-up rates for each time point ranged from 58% to 68%, and 30 clients (45%) were interviewed at every time point. Those who were consistently followed (N = 30) did not differ from those who were not consistently followed (N = 36) on demographics or on outcome variables measured at baseline. Comparison of mean outcome scores across time using MANOVA indicated significant changes from baseline to 6 months in the areas of alcohol, drug, legal, and social problem severity, and these changes were maintained up to 18 months postadmission. Outcomes reflecting psychiatric symptoms and employment also changed over time, but exhibited different patterns of change. Results are confounded by treatment received, since many respondents also participated in residential treatment during follow-up. Day treatment can serve clients having a range of substance abuse problems, and can act as a bridge to traditional residential treatment. Randomized clinical trials, where clients receive only one or the other type of treatment, are needed to assess the effectiveness of day treatment alone.
进入日间治疗并持续至少2周的客户(N = 66)在基线后的6个月、12个月和18个月接受了访谈。每个时间点的随访率在58%至68%之间,30名客户(45%)在每个时间点都接受了访谈。在人口统计学或基线时测量的结果变量方面,持续接受随访的客户(N = 30)与未持续接受随访的客户(N = 36)没有差异。使用多变量方差分析对不同时间的平均结果分数进行比较表明,从基线到6个月,在酒精、药物、法律和社会问题严重程度方面有显著变化,且这些变化在入院后长达18个月时仍保持。反映精神症状和就业情况的结果也随时间发生了变化,但呈现出不同的变化模式。由于许多受访者在随访期间也参与了住院治疗,结果受到所接受治疗的混淆。日间治疗可以为有一系列药物滥用问题的客户提供服务,并可以作为通往传统住院治疗的桥梁。需要进行随机临床试验,让客户只接受一种或另一种类型的治疗,以评估单独日间治疗的有效性。