Marshall R J
Department of Community Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Jan;50(1):15-9. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00315-0.
It has recently been shown that the bias due to misclassification of a binary exposure in case-control studies can be simply expressed in terms of so-called quality indices. Quality indices are measures of the degree of misclassification that are symmetric with respect to the true and measured exposure. They can be estimated from sub-study validation data and used to estimate the bias. Bias is not present if quality indices are nondifferential with respect to cases and controls. In this article the sampling distribution of these indices is investigated by developing formulae for their standard errors and these formulae are used to derive the standard error of the estimated bias. Simulation studies are used to confirm the validity of the formulae. The formulae are used to assess the bias in two studies of risk factors for Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and can be applied to the assessment of diagnostic tests.
最近有研究表明,病例对照研究中二元暴露误分类导致的偏差可以简单地用所谓的质量指标来表示。质量指标是衡量误分类程度的指标,对于真实暴露和测量暴露是对称的。它们可以从子研究验证数据中估计出来,并用于估计偏差。如果质量指标在病例和对照之间是非差异的,则不存在偏差。在本文中,通过推导这些指标的标准误差公式来研究这些指标的抽样分布,并使用这些公式来推导估计偏差的标准误差。模拟研究用于确认公式的有效性。这些公式用于评估两项婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)危险因素研究中的偏差,并可应用于诊断试验的评估。