Edan G, Miller D, Clanet M, Confavreux C, Lyon-Caen O, Lubetzki C, Brochet B, Berry I, Rolland Y, Froment J C, Cabanis E, Iba-Zizen M T, Gandon J M, Lai H M, Moseley I, Sabouraud O
Department of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Rennes, France.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997 Feb;62(2):112-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.62.2.112.
To evaluate the efficiency of mitoxantrone in multiple sclerosis.
Forty two patients with confirmed multiple sclerosis, selected as having a very active disease on clinical and MRI criteria were randomised to receive either mitoxantrone (20 mg intravenously (IV) monthly) and methylprednisolone (1 g iv monthly) or methylprednisolone alone over six months. In the steroid alone group five patients dropped out due to severe exacerbation.
Blinded analysis of MRI data showed significantly more patients with no new enhancing lesions in the mitoxantrone group compared with the steroid alone group, (90% v 31%, P < 0.001). In the mitoxantrone group there was a month by month decrease almost to zero in the number of new enhancing lesions, and in the total number of enhancing lesions, whereas both remained high in the steroid alone group. The differences were significant for both indices at all months from 1-6. Unblinded clinical assessments showed a significant improvement in change in EDSS at months 2-6 in the mitoxantrone group, with a final mean improvement of more than one point (-1.1 v + 0.3; P < 0.001). There was a significant reduction in the number of relapses (7 v 31; P < 0.01), and an increase in the number of patients free of exacerbation (14 v 7; P < 0.05).
In this selected group of patients with multiple sclerosis with very active disease, mitoxantrone combined with methylprednisolone was effective in improving both clinical and MRI indices of disease activity over a period of six months whereas methylprednisolone alone was not. Further double blinded long term studies are needed to properly evaluate the effect of mitoxantrone on progression in disability.
评估米托蒽醌治疗多发性硬化症的疗效。
42例确诊为多发性硬化症的患者,根据临床和MRI标准被选为疾病活动非常活跃的患者,随机分为两组,一组接受米托蒽醌(每月静脉注射20mg)和甲泼尼龙(每月静脉注射1g),另一组仅接受甲泼尼龙,为期6个月。在仅使用类固醇的组中,有5名患者因严重病情加重而退出。
对MRI数据的盲法分析显示,与仅使用类固醇的组相比,米托蒽醌组中无新强化病灶的患者明显更多(90%对31%,P<0.001)。在米托蒽醌组中,新强化病灶的数量以及强化病灶的总数逐月下降,几乎降至零,而在仅使用类固醇的组中这两个指标均保持在较高水平。在第1至6个月的所有月份,这两个指标的差异均具有统计学意义。非盲法临床评估显示,米托蒽醌组在第2至6个月时扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)变化有显著改善,最终平均改善超过1分(-1.1对+0.3;P<0.001)。复发次数显著减少(7次对31次;P<0.01),病情未加重的患者数量增加(14例对7例;P<0.05)。
在这组选定的疾病活动非常活跃的多发性硬化症患者中,米托蒽醌联合甲泼尼龙在6个月的时间内有效改善了疾病活动的临床和MRI指标,而单独使用甲泼尼龙则无效。需要进一步进行双盲长期研究,以正确评估米托蒽醌对残疾进展的影响。