Marionnet A V, Lizard G, Chardonnet Y, Schmitt D
INSERM U346 Pavillon R, Hôpital E. Herriot, Lyon, France.
Cell Biol Toxicol. 1997 Feb;13(2):115-23. doi: 10.1023/b:cbto.0000010396.88482.54.
We compared three techniques, the MTT tetrazolium assay, cell counting, and tritiated thymidine ([3H]TdR) incorporation assay to measure the antiproliferative effect of cyclosporin A (CsA) and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) on normal human skin keratinocyte cultures (NHK) used at the second passage and human papilomavirus type 16- and 18-transformed cell lines (EK16 and EK18) exposed continuously to the drugs for 3 days. The three techniques showed that under CsA (0.5 and 8 micrograms/ml) and IFN-gamma (5 and 160 U/ml) treatments the cells remained viable and that the growth of keratinocytes was inhibited. For IFN-gamma, the MTT colorimetric assay consistently underestimated its growth inhibitory activity as compared to cell counting or [3H]TdR incorporation, whatever the cells used. For high doses of CsA, MTT and cell counting gave similar percentages, of inhibitory activity whatever the cells; MTT underestimated this activity as compared to [3H]TdR incorporation only in NHK and EK18 cells, whereas similar results were obtained with EK16 cells. In conclusion, this investigations shows that MTT sensitivity differed with the drug and also according to the keratinocyte cultures. The MTT test is clearly not appropriate for study of IFN-gamma treatment whatever the keratinocytes used. Such discrepancies indicate that the MTT test should be done with care on cultures to measure the effects of drugs on cell growth; the growth inhibition should be carefully considered and it would be best if two different methods were used.
我们比较了三种技术,即MTT四氮唑盐检测法、细胞计数法和氚标记胸腺嘧啶核苷([3H]TdR)掺入检测法,以测定环孢菌素A(CsA)和γ干扰素(IFN-γ)对传代至第二代的正常人皮肤角质形成细胞培养物(NHK)以及持续暴露于药物3天的16型和18型人乳头瘤病毒转化细胞系(EK16和EK18)的抗增殖作用。这三种技术显示,在CsA(0.5和8微克/毫升)和IFN-γ(5和160单位/毫升)处理下,细胞仍保持活力,角质形成细胞的生长受到抑制。对于IFN-γ,无论使用何种细胞,与细胞计数法或[3H]TdR掺入法相比,MTT比色法始终低估其生长抑制活性。对于高剂量的CsA,无论使用何种细胞,MTT法和细胞计数法得出的抑制活性百分比相似;与[3H]TdR掺入法相比,MTT法仅在NHK和EK18细胞中低估了这种活性,而EK16细胞得到的结果相似。总之,本研究表明MTT的敏感性因药物不同而异,也因角质形成细胞培养物不同而有所差异。无论使用何种角质形成细胞,MTT检测显然不适用于研究IFN-γ治疗。这些差异表明,在培养物上进行MTT检测以测定药物对细胞生长的影响时应谨慎;应仔细考虑生长抑制情况,最好使用两种不同的方法。